Literature DB >> 16484656

Around the clock surveillance: simple graphic disturbance in patients with hemispatial neglect carries implications for the clock drawing task.

A D Smith1, I D Gilchrist, S H Butler, M Harvey.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Drawing, and the clock drawing task in particular, is widely used as a diagnostic tool in the study of hemispatial neglect. It is generally assumed that the errors in graphic production, such as the misplacement of numbers, reflect a visuospatial deficit, and that drawing production itself (for example, producing the circle) is unimpaired.
OBJECTIVES: To test this assumption by examining whether the production of simple circles is affected by neglect.
METHODS: 16 right hemisphere stroke patients copied circles of various sizes and their drawings were measured for size accuracy.
RESULTS: Patients with more severe neglect produced greater scaling errors, consistently drawing the circle smaller than the original. Errors were not in the horizontal axis alone--shrinkage occurred equally in both height and width axes.
CONCLUSIONS: Neglect can co-occur with constructional difficulties that serve to exacerbate the symptoms presented. This should be taken into account in the assessment of even apparently simple drawing tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16484656      PMCID: PMC2077724          DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2005.071472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry        ISSN: 0022-3050            Impact factor:   10.154


  14 in total

1.  Spatial working memory deficit in unilateral neglect.

Authors:  E Wojciulik; M Husain; K Clarke; J Driver
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  The role of vision in repetitive circle drawing.

Authors:  H N Zelaznik; D Lantero
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1996-06

3.  Graphic neglect--more than the sum of the parts.

Authors:  P W Halligan; J C Marshall
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  Cognitive processing of drawing abilities.

Authors:  F Guérin; B Ska; S Belleville
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  A comparison of scoring protocols on the Clock Drawing Test in relation to ease of use, diagnostic group, and correlations with Mini-Mental State Examination.

Authors:  Hayley E Richardson; John N Glass
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  A comparison of alternative approaches to the scoring of clock drawing.

Authors:  H Tuokko; T Hadjistavropoulos; S Rae; N O'Rourke
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.813

7.  Quantitative and qualitative analyses of clock drawings in Alzheimer's and Huntington's disease.

Authors:  I Rouleau; D P Salmon; N Butters; C Kennedy; K McGuire
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  The anatomy of spatial neglect based on voxelwise statistical analysis: a study of 140 patients.

Authors:  Hans-Otto Karnath; Monika Fruhmann Berger; Wilhelm Küker; Chris Rorden
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Development of scoring criteria for the clock drawing task in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  M F Mendez; T Ala; K L Underwood
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 5.562

10.  The basis of visual constructional disability in patients with unilateral cerebral lesions.

Authors:  J L Mack; R N Levine
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 4.027

View more
  2 in total

1.  Clock drawing in children with perinatal stroke.

Authors:  Omid Yousefian; Angela O Ballantyne; Alex Doo; Doris A Trauner
Journal:  Pediatr Neurol       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 3.372

2.  Clock drawing in spatial neglect: a comprehensive analysis of clock perimeter, placement, and accuracy.

Authors:  Peii Chen; Kelly M Goedert
Journal:  J Neuropsychol       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 2.864

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.