Literature DB >> 16484350

Acute massive gastrointestinal bleeding: detection and localization with arterial phase multi-detector row helical CT.

Woong Yoon1, Yong Yeon Jeong, Sang Soo Shin, Hyo Soon Lim, Sang Gook Song, Nam Gyu Jang, Jae Kyu Kim, Heoung Keun Kang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate accuracy of arterial phase multi-detector row helical computed tomography (CT) for detection and localization of acute massive gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, with angiography as reference standard.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approved this study; written informed consent was obtained from each patient or patient's family after procedures, including radiation dose, were explained. Twenty-six consecutive patients (17 men, nine women; age range, 18-89 years) had acute massive GI bleeding (defined as requirement of transfusion of at least 4 units of blood during 24 hours in the hospital or as hypotension with systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg) and underwent arterial phase multi-detector row CT before angiography. Scans were obtained during arterial phase to identify extravasation of contrast material with attenuation greater than 90 HU within bowel lumen; this finding was considered diagnostic for active GI bleeding. Presence of contrast medium extravasation in each anatomic location was recorded. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of multi-detector row CT for detection of acute GI bleeding were assessed. Accuracy for localization of acute GI bleeding was assessed by comparing locations of active bleeding at both multi-detector row CT and angiography in each patient who had active bleeding.
RESULTS: Arterial phase multi-detector row CT depicted extravasation of contrast material in 21 of 26 patients. Overall location-based sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values of multi-detector row CT for detection of GI bleeding were 90.9% (20 of 22), 99% (107 of 108), 97.6% (127 of 130), 95% (20 of 21), and 98% (107 of 109), respectively. Overall patient-based accuracy of multi-detector row CT for detection of acute GI bleeding was 88.5% (23 of 26). The location of contrast material extravasation on multi-detector row CT scans corresponded exactly to that of active bleeding on angiograms in all patients with contrast medium extravasation at both multi-detector row CT and angiography.
CONCLUSION: Arterial phase multi-detector row CT is accurate for detection and localization of bleeding sites in patients with acute massive GI bleeding. (c) RSNA, 2006.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16484350     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2383050175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  59 in total

1.  Multiphase multidetector CT in the diagnosis of haemobilia: a potentially catastrophic ruptured hepatic artery aneurysm complicating the treatment of a patient with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  A M Mortimer; A Wallis; A Planner
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Role of interventional radiology in the emergent management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Rakesh Navuluri; Jay Patel; Lisa Kang
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.513

3.  Evaluation of dual-phase multi-detector-row CT for detection of intestinal bleeding using an experimental bowel model.

Authors:  Martin Dobritz; Heinz-Peter Engels; Armin Schneider; Hinrich Wieder; Hubertus Feussner; Ernst J Rummeny; Jens C Stollfuss
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  MDCT of acute cecal conditions.

Authors:  Matthew T Heller; Puneet Bhargava
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2013-10-05

5.  Massive lower gastrointestinal bleeding from the appendix.

Authors:  Kyu Sung Chung; Jian Peng Gao
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 4.519

6.  Acute gastrointestinal bleeding: detection of source and etiology with multi-detector-row CT.

Authors:  Hans Scheffel; Thomas Pfammatter; Stefan Wildi; Peter Bauerfeind; Borut Marincek; Hatem Alkadhi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Prospective study comparing multi-detector row CT and endoscopy in acute gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Fabrizio M Frattaroli; Emanuele Casciani; Domenico Spoletini; Elisabetta Polettini; Aldo Nunziale; Luca Bertini; Annarita Vestri; Gianfranco Gualdi; Giuseppe Pappalardo
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  The clinical outcomes of transcatheter microcoil embolization in patients with active lower gastrointestinal bleeding in the small bowel.

Authors:  Hyo-Sung Kwak; Young-Min Han; Soo-Teik Lee
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 3.500

9.  Angiographically negative acute arterial upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding: incidence, predictive factors, and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Jin Hyoung Kim; Ji Hoon Shin; Hyun-Ki Yoon; Eun Young Chae; Seung-Jae Myung; Gi-Young Ko; Dong Il Gwon; Kyu-Bo Sung
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  Bleeding duodenal ulcer after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery: the value of laparoscopic gastroduodenoscopy.

Authors:  Hussain Issa; Osama Al-Saif; Sami Al-Momen; Bahaa Bseiso; Ahmed Al-Salem
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.526

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.