Literature DB >> 1648433

Ki-67 immunostaining in node-negative stage I/II breast carcinoma. Significant correlation with prognosis.

A A Sahin1, J Ro, J Y Ro, M B Blick, A K el-Naggar, N G Ordonez, H A Fritsche, T L Smith, G N Hortobagyi, A G Ayala.   

Abstract

Prognostic predictors for node-negative breast carcinoma have not been clearly established. Immunostaining with Ki-67 antibody was performed on frozen sections of histologically proved node-negative breast carcinomas from 42 patients to examine its prognostic value and its association with other clinicopathologic and biochemical parameters, i.e., patient age and tumor size, histologic type, nuclear grade, mitotic rate, presence of vascular or lymphatic invasion, DNA ploidy, percentage of cells in S-phase, estrogen content, and c-erbB-2 amplification. Thirty-seven of the 42 tumors showed immunoreactivity with Ki-67 antibody in 1% to 55% of the tumor cells. A strongly significant correlation was observed between Ki-67 staining percentage and, respectively, nuclear grade, age, and mitotic rate. Nuclear grade 1 (the most anaplastic) tumors showed a significantly higher median percentage of cells stained (median, 14; range, 3 to 40) compared with nuclear grade 3 tumors (median, 0.5; range, 0 to 8). Thirteen patients developed recurrence; six of them died of disease. On univariate analysis, both 5-year disease-free and overall survivals were strongly associated with percentage of cells stained with Ki-67 antibody. Our results suggest that Ki-67 immunostaining correlates well with nuclear grade and clinical outcome in node-negative breast carcinoma. Because of small sample size analyzed in this study we were unable to do multivariate analysis. Therefore, further studies with larger number of cases are needed to determine whether tumor proliferative activity determined by Ki-67 immunostaining is an independent prognostic parameter or it merely reflects histopathologic features such as nuclear grade or mitotic activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1648433     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19910801)68:3<549::aid-cncr2820680318>3.0.co;2-j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  43 in total

Review 1.  Proliferation markers in tumours: interpretation and clinical value.

Authors:  P J van Diest; G Brugal; J P Baak
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Multicentric Breast Carcinoma: Evaluation of Clinicopathological and Immunohistochemical Characteristics.

Authors: 
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  1996-12-20       Impact factor: 4.239

3.  Biological indices in the assessment of breast cancer.

Authors:  A S Leong; A K Lee
Journal:  Clin Mol Pathol       Date:  1995-10

4.  Regional differences in breast cancer biomarkers in american Indian and Alaska native women.

Authors:  Judith S Kaur; Robert A Vierkant; Timothy Hobday; Daniel Visscher
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Adenomatous tumors of the middle ear and temporal bone: clinical, morphological and tumor biological characteristics of challenging neoplastic lesions.

Authors:  M Duderstadt; Christine Förster; H-J Welkoborsky; H Ostertag
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Quantitative histopathology in lymph node-negative breast cancer. Prognostic significance of mitotic counts.

Authors:  M Ladekarl; V Jensen
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.064

7.  PCNA immunostaining combined with AgNOR staining in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma to identify patients with a poor prognosis.

Authors:  Y Morisaki; S Shima; Y Yoshizumi; Y Sugiura; S Tanaka; S Tamai
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.549

8.  Prognostic and predictive value of centrally reviewed Ki-67 labeling index in postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive breast cancer: results from Breast International Group Trial 1-98 comparing adjuvant tamoxifen with letrozole.

Authors:  Giuseppe Viale; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Meredith M Regan; Alan S Coates; Mauro G Mastropasqua; Patrizia Dell'Orto; Eugenio Maiorano; Gaëtan MacGrogan; Stephen G Braye; Christian Ohlschlegel; Patrick Neven; Zsolt Orosz; Wojciech P Olszewski; Fiona Knox; Beat Thürlimann; Karen N Price; Monica Castiglione-Gertsch; Richard D Gelber; Barry A Gusterson; Aron Goldhirsch
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-11-03       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Classical and Novel Prognostic Markers for Breast Cancer and their Clinical Significance.

Authors:  Pankaj Taneja; Dejan Maglic; Fumitake Kai; Sinan Zhu; Robert D Kendig; Elizabeth A Fry; Kazushi Inoue
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Oncol       Date:  2010-04-20

10.  Prognostic significance of a formalin-resistant nuclear proliferation antigen in mammary carcinomas as determined by the monoclonal antibody Ki-S1.

Authors:  H Kreipe; P Alm; H Olsson; M Hauberg; L Fischer; R Parwaresch
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.307

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.