Literature DB >> 16484145

Impact of background noise on reaction time and brain DC potential changes of VDT-based spatial attention.

Michael Trimmel1, Gerhard Poelzl.   

Abstract

Background noise is often discussed in terms of mental costs. In this study the effect of background noise on brain activity as reflected by the direct coupled (DC) potential was investigated by a within design in ten participants. During two successive blocks of 7 min each, participants performed 156 trials of a visual display terminal (VDT)-based visual-spatial attention task without noise and two blocks with a mixture of the environmental noises of barking dogs, traffic noise and irrelevant speech of 60 dBA. Brain DC potentials were recorded along the midline and analysed for change by time on task. For noise conditions, reaction time was prolonged and the DC-potential shifted towards positivity, contrary to control condition, independent of block and location. Results suggest reduced cortical resources by widespread inhibitory activation through background noise. It can be concluded that even low intensity background noise is associated with energy consumption and with impaired performance in spatial attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16484145     DOI: 10.1080/00140130500434986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  8 in total

1.  Visual temporal order judgment in profoundly deaf individuals.

Authors:  Elena Nava; Davide Bottari; Massimiliano Zampini; Francesco Pavani
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Background sound modulates the performance of odor discrimination task.

Authors:  Han-Seok Seo; Volker Gudziol; Antje Hähner; Thomas Hummel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-21       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Distracting effect of TV watching on children's reactivity.

Authors:  Carlo V Bellieni; Giulio Fontani; Franco Corradeschi; Lorenzo Iantorno; Marianna Maffei; Silvia Migliorini; Serafina Perrone; Giuseppe Buonocore
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2010-03-14       Impact factor: 3.183

4.  Low-arousal speech noise improves performance in N-back task: an ERP study.

Authors:  Longzhu Han; Yunzhe Liu; Dandan Zhang; Yi Jin; Yuejia Luo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Comparison of reaction response time between hand and foot controlled devices in simulated microsurgical testing.

Authors:  Marcel Pfister; Jaw-Chyng L Lue; Francisco R Stefanini; Paulo Falabella; Laurie Dustin; Michael J Koss; Mark S Humayun
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-07-06       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Acoustic noise alters selective attention processes as indicated by direct current (DC) brain potential changes.

Authors:  Karin Trimmel; Julia Schätzer; Michael Trimmel
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  The impact of simulated MRI scanner background noise on visual attention processes as measured by the EEG.

Authors:  S Oliver Kobald; Stephan Getzmann; Christian Beste; Edmund Wascher
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Predicting and mitigating fatigue effects due to sleep deprivation: A review.

Authors:  Kylie C Kayser; Vannia A Puig; Justin R Estepp
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 5.152

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.