Literature DB >> 16484097

The relationship of the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS) to functional capacity and real-world functional outcome.

Richard S E Keefe1, Margaret Poe, Trina M Walker, Philip D Harvey.   

Abstract

The Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS) assesses five different domains of cognitive function with six tests, and takes about 30-35 minutes to complete in patients with schizophrenia. Previous work has demonstrated the reliability of this measure, and its sensitivity to the deficits of schizophrenia. However, the relationship of this brief cognitive measure to functional outcome has not been determined. Further, future registration trials for potentially cognitive enhancing compounds may not only assess efficacy with cognitive performance measures, but with assessments of real-world functional outcome and functional capacity. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between the BACS and a potential co-primary measure for treatment studies of cognition in schizophrenia, and to determine if such a measure accounts for significant variance in functioning beyond that provided by cognitive function. The current study assessed 60 patients with schizophrenia over the course of six months. Cognitive functions were measured with the BACS. Functional capacity was measured with the UCSD Performance-based Skills Assessment (UPSA). Real-world functional outcome was measured with the Independent Living Skills Inventory (ILSI). BACS composite scores were significantly correlated with functional capacity as measured by the UPSA (r = .65, df = 55, p < .001), and real-world functional outcome as assessed by the ILSI (r = .37, df = 56, p = .005). In multiple regression analyses, UPSA scores did not account for additional variance in real-world functioning beyond that accounted for by the BACS. These data suggest that brief cognitive assessments such as the BACS are able to assess aspects of cognition that are related to important functional measures in clinical trials of cognitive enhancement. They also suggest that the measures being considered as potential co-primary indicators of cognitive function for registration trials are significantly correlated with cognition as assessed by brief cognitive assessments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16484097     DOI: 10.1080/13803390500360539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol        ISSN: 1380-3395            Impact factor:   2.475


  44 in total

1.  Exploratory analysis of normative performance on the UCSD Performance-Based Skills Assessment-Brief.

Authors:  Lea Vella; Thomas L Patterson; Philip D Harvey; Margaret McNamara McClure; Brent T Mausbach; Michael J Taylor; Elizabeth W Twamley
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 3.222

2.  Hypo-activation in the executive core of the sustained attention network in adolescent offspring of schizophrenia patients mediated by premorbid functional deficits.

Authors:  Vaibhav A Diwadkar; Jamie Segel; Patrick Pruitt; Eric R Murphy; Matcheri S Keshavan; Jacqueline Radwan; Usha Rajan; Caroline Zajac-Benitez
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 3.222

3.  Cognitive performance and functional competence as predictors of community independence in schizophrenia.

Authors:  R Walter Heinrichs; Narmeen Ammari; Ashley A Miles; Stephanie McDermid Vaz
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 9.306

4.  Inflammation in individuals with schizophrenia - Implications for neurocognition and daily function.

Authors:  Sophia Kogan; Luz H Ospina; David Kimhy
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 7.217

5.  Validating measures of real-world outcome: the results of the VALERO expert survey and RAND panel.

Authors:  Feea R Leifker; Thomas L Patterson; Robert K Heaton; Philip D Harvey
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 9.306

6.  Self-conscious emotions׳ role in functional outcomes within clinical populations.

Authors:  Rebecca Macaulay; Alex Cohen
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.222

Review 7.  Neurocognition: clinical and functional outcomes in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Martin Lepage; Michael Bodnar; Christopher R Bowie
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.356

8.  Effects of milnacipran on neurocognition, pain, and fatigue in fibromyalgia: a 13-week, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial.

Authors:  Jeong Lan Kim; Shilpa Rele; David M Marks; Prakash S Masand; Pallavi Yerramsetty; Robert A Millet; Richard S Keefe; Ashwin A Patkar
Journal:  Prim Care Companion CNS Disord       Date:  2014-12-26

9.  A brief cognitive assessment tool for schizophrenia: construction of a tool for clinicians.

Authors:  Irene M Hurford; Stephen R Marder; Richard S E Keefe; Steven P Reise; Robert M Bilder
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 9.306

10.  Initial validation of a computerized version of the UCSD Performance-Based Skills Assessment (C-UPSA) for assessing functioning in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Raeanne C Moore; Alexandrea L Harmell; Jennifer Ho; Thomas L Patterson; Lisa T Eyler; Dilip V Jeste; Brent T Mausbach
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 4.939

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.