Literature DB >> 16482793

Surgical delay in the management of dog bite injuries in children, does it increase the risk of infection?

N Akhtar1, M J Smith, S McKirdy, R E Page.   

Abstract

Dog bites are contaminated wounds and convention dictates that any surgical treatment should be performed at the earliest opportunity. This practice, however, may be in direct conflict with NCEPOD guidelines to reduce night time operating. We audited our treatment of dog bite injuries in children over a 5-year period (1998-2002) to determine whether delaying surgery to conform to operating guidelines increased the incidence of infection. A retrospective case note study identified 118 patients admitted to Sheffield Children's Hospital with dog bite injuries. Details of their injury, treatment and outcome were recorded. There were 70 males and 48 females and an average age of 6.6 years (range 1-15 years). The most common type of injury was a single laceration (32%) and the most frequent site of injury was the face (59%). The majority of wounds (68%) were cleaned and dressed before theatre and 89% were closed directly after minimal debridement. All patients received prophylactic antibiotics. Of the 114 patients that required surgery, 57 (50%) were operated on within 12 h of their injury and 57 (50%) after 12 h. There were three cases of infection in the early group (<12 h) and none in the delayed group (>12 h). We suggest that delaying the surgical treatment of dog bites in children to avoid operating at night does not increase the infection rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16482793     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2005.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  9 in total

Review 1.  [The assessment of bite injuries from a forensic point of view].

Authors:  Sebastian N Kunz; Jiri Adamec; Christina Grove
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2014-12-12

2.  Animal bite injuries to the face : A Case Report.

Authors:  Niverso Rodrigues Simao; Alexandre Meireles Borba; Andre Luis Fernandes da Silva; Evanice Menezes Marcal Vieira; Artur Aburad Carvalhosa; Matheus Coelho Bandeca; Alvaro Henrique Borges
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2013-08-28

3.  Analysis of pediatric facial dog bites.

Authors:  Henry H Chen; Anna T Neumeier; Brett W Davies; Vikram D Durairaj
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2013-09-03

4.  Animal and human bite injuries: a 5-year retrospective study in a large urban public hospital in Venezuela.

Authors:  Muñoz Gelvez; Ruben Enrique; Golaszewski Gajos; Jose Bladimir; Diaz Carvajal; Alvaro Luis
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-09-13

5.  [Surgical treatment of bites].

Authors:  D Saul; K Dresing
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 1.154

6.  The management of animal bites in the United kingdom.

Authors:  E Evgeniou; D Markeson; S Iyer; A Armstrong
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2013-06-10

Review 7.  Animal Bite Injuries in Children: Review of Literature and Case Series.

Authors:  Aviral Agrawal; Pradeep Kumar; Ruchi Singhal; Virendra Singh; Amrish Bhagol
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2017-02-27

Review 8.  Dog bite injuries to the face: A narrative review of the literature.

Authors:  Shirwa Sheik Ali; Sharaf Sheik Ali
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2022-05-04

9.  Dog Bites in Children: A Descriptive Analysis.

Authors:  Connor McGuire; Alex Morzycki; Andrew Simpson; Jason Williams; Michael Bezuhly
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 0.947

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.