Literature DB >> 16482765

Comparison of parental report of blood lead testing in children enrolled in Medicaid with Medicaid claims data and blood lead surveillance reports.

Barbara J Polivka1, Pamela Salsberry, Marcel J Casavant, Rosemary V Chaudry, Donna C Bush.   

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to identify the congruence of blood lead testing based on parental self-reports with Medicaid claims and blood lead surveillance records, and to determine factors associated with agreement between parental reports of blood lead tests and Medicaid claims or blood lead surveillance records. Data were obtained from a cross-sectional mailed survey of a randomly selected sample of parents of children 1-2 years old enrolled in Medicaid (n=532) and from existing Medicaid claims and blood lead surveillance records. Fifty-six percent of survey respondents reported their child had a blood lead test completed. Of these, only 56% could be confirmed with Medicaid claims/blood lead surveillance data. Logistic regression analysis revealed the odds of blood lead testing per parental report confirmed with Medicaid claims/blood lead surveillance data were 2.6 times greater if the child had > or =3 provider visits, 2.5 times greater if parents reported receiving a reminder about blood lead testing, 2.2 times greater if parents reported receiving information about lead poisoning, 1.6 times greater if residing in an urban county, and 1.5 times greater if the child was more than 2 years old. In conclusion, parents are not always aware if their child had a blood lead test. Information and reminders about blood lead testing should be distributed to parents of young children enrolled in Medicaid and frequently reviewed by healthcare providers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16482765     DOI: 10.1007/s10900-005-8188-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Health        ISSN: 0094-5145


  31 in total

1.  Will electronic records become routine?

Authors:  Bill Briggs
Journal:  Health Data Manag       Date:  2002-05

2.  Applicability of a filter paper method to measure blood lead levels in large populations of Chinese children.

Authors:  Xiao-Ming Shen; Yi-Wen Zhang; Sheng-Hu Wu; Chong-Huai Yan; Jie-Min Ying; Ren-Qiu Li
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.786

3.  From research to policy: Targeting the primary prevention of childhood lead poisoning.

Authors:  Felicia A Rabito; LuAnn E White; Charles Shorter
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  An unfunded mandate. The path to electronic records must be paved with someone's cash.

Authors:  Todd Sloane
Journal:  Mod Healthc       Date:  2004-05-17

5.  Rural residents' knowledge of lead poisoning prevention.

Authors:  B J Polivka
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1999-10

6.  Recommendations for blood lead screening of young children enrolled in medicaid: targeting a group at high risk.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2000-12-08

7.  Counseling to prevent childhood lead poisoning.

Authors:  C E Chaisson; D E Glotzer
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.798

8.  Lifetime low-level exposure to environmental lead and children's emotional and behavioral development at ages 11-13 years. The Port Pirie Cohort Study.

Authors:  J M Burns; P A Baghurst; M G Sawyer; A J McMichael; S L Tong
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1999-04-15       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Lead poisoning: a summary of treatment and prevention.

Authors:  S M Cohen
Journal:  Pediatr Nurs       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr

10.  Surveillance for elevated blood lead levels among children--United States, 1997-2001.

Authors:  Pamela A Meyer; Timothy Pivetz; Timothy A Dignam; David M Homa; Jaime Schoonover; Debra Brody
Journal:  MMWR Surveill Summ       Date:  2003-09-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.