Literature DB >> 16482580

Remarkable similarity in body mass of a secondary hyperparasitoid Lysibia nana and its primary parasitoid host Cotesia glomerata emerging from cocoons of comparable size.

Jeffrey A Harvey1, Louise E M Vet, Leontien M A Witjes, T Martijn Bezemer.   

Abstract

Lysibia nana is a solitary, secondary idiobiont hyperparasitoid that attacks newly cocooned pre-pupae and pupae of several closely related gregarious endoparasitoids in the genus Cotesia, including C. glomerata. Prior to oviposition, the female wasp injects paralysing venom into the host, thus preventing further development. Here, host fate, emerging hyperparasitoid mass, and egg-to-adult development time was compared in hosts parasitized at different ages over 24-h intervals. Cocoons of C. glomerata were parasitized by L. nana at 12, 36, 60, 84, and 108 h post-egression from the secondary host, Pieris brassicae. Hyperparasitoid survival exceeded 80% in hosts parasitized within the first 60 h after pupation, but dropped thereafter, with no hyperparasitoids emerging in hosts aged 108 h. The mass of hyperparasitoids was positively correlated with the mass of the host cocoon, and this relationship remained consistent in hosts up to 60 h old. Within each host age cohort, the mass of male and female wasps was not significantly different. Development time in L. nana was uniform in hosts up to 60 h old, but increased significantly in 84-h-old hosts, and male wasps completed their development earlier than female wasps. Regulation of host growth varied with the age of the host at parasitism, with the early growth of older hosts reduced much more dramatically than young hosts. Unlike most parasitoids, pupal hyperparasitoids do not make cocoons but instead pupate within the already prepared cocoon of the host parasitoid. Consequently, for a given mass of cocoon, newly emerged L. nana adults were remarkably similar in size with male and female adults of C. glomerata. This reveals that L. nana is extremely efficient at exploiting its primary parasitoid host.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16482580     DOI: 10.1002/arch.20080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Insect Biochem Physiol        ISSN: 0739-4462            Impact factor:   1.698


  4 in total

1.  Differing Host Exploitation Efficiencies in Two Hyperparasitoids: When is a 'Match Made in Heaven'?

Authors:  Jeffrey A Harvey; Roel Wagenaar; Rieta Gols
Journal:  J Insect Behav       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 1.309

2.  The evolution of body size, antennal size and host use in parasitoid wasps (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea): a phylogenetic comparative analysis.

Authors:  Matthew R E Symonds; Mark A Elgar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Trophic assimilation efficiency markedly increases at higher trophic levels in four-level host-parasitoid food chain.

Authors:  Dirk Sanders; Andrea Moser; Jason Newton; F J Frank van Veen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Density-Dependent Growth and Fitness in Dastarcus helophoroides (Coleoptera: Bothrideridae).

Authors:  Shang-Kun Gao; Cui-Cui Geng; Ying-Chao Ji; Zi-Kun Li; Cheng-Gang Zhou
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 2.769

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.