Literature DB >> 16482234

Role of duodenogastroesophageal reflux in the pathogenesis of esophageal mucosal injury and gastroesophageal reflux symptoms.

Xiao-rong Xu1, Zhao-shen Li, Duo-wu Zou, Guo-ming Xu, Ping Ye, Zhen-xing Sun, Qing Wang, Yan-jun Zeng.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) usually suffer from acid reflux and duodenogastroesophageal reflux (DGER) simultaneously. The question of whether DGER has an important effect on the development of GERD remains controversial. The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of DGER in the pathogenesis of GERD and its value for the diagnosis of nonerosive reflux disease (NERD).
METHODS: GERD was initially diagnosed using the reflux disease questionnaire. For further diagnosis, results of the upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (excluding a diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus) were considered in conjunction with simultaneous 24 h esophageal pH and bilirubin monitoring.
RESULTS: According to endoscopic findings, 95 patients (43 men, 50+/-10 years of age) were divided into two groups: the reflux esophagitis (RE) group (n=51) and the NERD group (n=44). Three DGER parameters, the percentage of time with absorbance greater than 0.14, the total number of reflux episodes and the number of bile reflux episodes lasting longer than 5 min, were evaluated in the study. For the RE group, the values of the DGER parameters (19.05%+/-23.44%, 30.56+/-34.04 and 5.90+/-6.37, respectively) were significantly higher than those of the NERD group (7.26%+/-11.08%, 15.68+/-20.92 and 2.59+/-3.57, respectively, P<0.05 for all) but no significant difference was found in acid reflux. Of NERD patients, 18.5% were diagnosed with simple DGER. The positive diagnosis rate of NERD could be significantly elevated from 65.9% to 84.1% (P<0.05), if bilirubin monitoring was employed in diagnosis.
CONCLUSIONS: DGER may occur independently but plays an important role in the development of RE and GERD symptoms. Simultaneous 24 h esophageal pH and bilirubin monitoring is superior to simple pH monitoring in helping identify patients at risk for NERD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16482234      PMCID: PMC2538978          DOI: 10.1155/2006/498142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0835-7900            Impact factor:   3.522


  21 in total

1.  Dietary restrictions during ambulatory monitoring of duodenogastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  Jan Tack; Raf Bisschops; Gerardus Koek; Daniel Sifrim; Tony Lerut; Jozef Janssens
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Human model of duodenogastro-oesophageal reflux in the development of Barrett's metaplasia.

Authors:  S M Dresner; S M Griffin; J Wayman; M K Bennett; N Hayes; S A Raimes
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Characteristics of distal partial gastrectomy patients with esophageal symptoms of duodenogastric reflux.

Authors:  R J Sears; G L Champion; J E Richter
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Presence of bile in the oesophagus is associated with less effective oesophageal motility.

Authors:  Jacob Freedman; Madeleine Lindqvist; Per M Hellström; Lars Granström; Erik Näslund
Journal:  Digestion       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.216

Review 5.  Diagnosis of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Determinants of oesophageal 'alkaline' pH environment in controls and patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  S Singh; L A Bradley; J E Richter
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 7.  The pathophysiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: an overview.

Authors:  J P Galmiche; J Janssens
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl       Date:  1995

8.  Gastroesophageal reflux disease poorly responsive to single-dose proton pump inhibitors in patients without Barrett's esophagus: acid reflux, bile reflux, or both?

Authors:  J Tack; G Koek; I Demedts; D Sifrim; J Janssens
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Validation studies of Bilitec 2000: an ambulatory duodenogastric reflux monitoring system.

Authors:  M F Vaezi; R G Lacamera; J E Richter
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1994-12

Review 10.  Gastroesophageal reflux disease--should we adopt a new conceptual framework?

Authors:  Ronnie Fass; Joshua J Ofman
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  3 in total

1.  Gastroesophageal reflux in cirrhotic patients without esophageal varices.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Pei-Lin Cui; Dong Lv; Shi-Wei Yao; You-Qing Xu; Zhao-Xu Yang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Esophagitis After Bariatric Surgery: Large Cross-sectional Assessment of an Endoscopic Database.

Authors:  Reem Matar; Daniel Maselli; Eric Vargas; Jaruvongvanich Veeravich; Fateh Bazerbachi; Azizullah Beran; Andrew C Storm; Todd Kellogg; Barham K Abu Dayyeh
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 3.  Systems Biology and Bile Acid Signalling in Microbiome-Host Interactions in the Cystic Fibrosis Lung.

Authors:  David F Woods; Stephanie Flynn; Jose A Caparrós-Martín; Stephen M Stick; F Jerry Reen; Fergal O'Gara
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.