STUDY DESIGN: A study of agreement between different measures of kyphosis, a clinical standing measure (Debrunner kyphometer; Protek AG, Bern, Switzerland) versus a supine radiologic measure (Cobb angle). OBJECTIVES: To determine whether a supine radiologic measure of kyphosis in older women is a reasonable estimate of clinical kyphosis determined in the standing position, and to investigate a computerized assessment of the Cobb angle. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Few studies have investigated kyphosis measurement agreement involving older adults. METHODS: Using data from the Fracture Intervention Trial, we randomly selected 120 women, aged 55-80 years, who had a Debrunner kyphometer measure of kyphosis and supine lateral spine radiographs from which we measured the Cobb angle (either manually or by digitization). We calculated the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) from repeated measures analysis of variance to assess the agreement among the: (1) manual Cobb angle and Debrunner kyphometer, (2) digitized Cobb angle and Debrunner kyphometer, and (3) manual and digitized Cobb angle. RESULTS: The mean of both the manual and digitized Cobb angle was 45 degrees (range 18 degrees-83 degrees), and the mean Debrunner kyphometer reading was 48 degrees (range 17 degrees-83 degrees). The ICC between either of the 2 measures of the Cobb angle and Debrunner measurement was 0.68, indicating reasonable agreement. The ICC between the manual and digitized Cobb angle was 0.99, indicating excellent agreement. CONCLUSIONS: There is reasonable agreement between a supine radiologic and standing clinical measurement of kyphosis in older women.
RCT Entities:
STUDY DESIGN: A study of agreement between different measures of kyphosis, a clinical standing measure (Debrunner kyphometer; Protek AG, Bern, Switzerland) versus a supine radiologic measure (Cobb angle). OBJECTIVES: To determine whether a supine radiologic measure of kyphosis in older women is a reasonable estimate of clinical kyphosis determined in the standing position, and to investigate a computerized assessment of the Cobb angle. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Few studies have investigated kyphosis measurement agreement involving older adults. METHODS: Using data from the Fracture Intervention Trial, we randomly selected 120 women, aged 55-80 years, who had a Debrunner kyphometer measure of kyphosis and supine lateral spine radiographs from which we measured the Cobb angle (either manually or by digitization). We calculated the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) from repeated measures analysis of variance to assess the agreement among the: (1) manual Cobb angle and Debrunner kyphometer, (2) digitized Cobb angle and Debrunner kyphometer, and (3) manual and digitized Cobb angle. RESULTS: The mean of both the manual and digitized Cobb angle was 45 degrees (range 18 degrees-83 degrees), and the mean Debrunner kyphometer reading was 48 degrees (range 17 degrees-83 degrees). The ICC between either of the 2 measures of the Cobb angle and Debrunner measurement was 0.68, indicating reasonable agreement. The ICC between the manual and digitized Cobb angle was 0.99, indicating excellent agreement. CONCLUSIONS: There is reasonable agreement between a supine radiologic and standing clinical measurement of kyphosis in older women.
Authors: Deborah M Kado; Mei-Hua Huang; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Gail A Greendale Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Gina N Woods; Mei-Hua Huang; Peggy M Cawthon; Gail A Laughlin; John T Schousboe; Corinne McDaniels-Davidson; Jane A Cauley; Eric Orwoll; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Deborah M Kado Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2016-11-03 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Amanda L Lorbergs; Joanne M Murabito; Mohamed Jarraya; Ali Guermazi; Brett T Allaire; Laiji Yang; Douglas P Kiel; L Adrienne Cupples; Mary L Bouxsein; Thomas G Travison; Elizabeth J Samelson Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2017-08-21 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Gina N Woods; Mei-Hua Huang; Peggy M Cawthon; Corinne McDaniels-Davidson; Howard A Fink; Deborah M Kado Journal: Menopause Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Amanda L Lorbergs; Brett T Allaire; Laiji Yang; Douglas P Kiel; L Adrienne Cupples; Mohamed Jarraya; Ali Guermazi; Thomas G Travison; Mary L Bouxsein; Dennis E Anderson; Elizabeth J Samelson Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2019-02-15 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Lorenzo Nardo; Nancy E Lane; Neeta Parimi; Peggy M Cawthon; Bo Fan; John Shepherd; Jane Cauley; Audrey Zucker-Levin; Rachel A Murphy; Wendy B Katzman Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2014-11-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Deborah M Kado; Dana Miller-Martinez; Li-Yung Lui; Peggy Cawthon; Wendy B Katzman; Teresa A Hillier; Howard A Fink; Kristine E Ensrud Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Wendy Katzman; Peggy Cawthon; Gregory E Hicks; Eric Vittinghoff; John Shepherd; Jane A Cauley; Tamara Harris; Eleanor M Simonsick; Elsa Strotmeyer; Catherine Womack; Deborah M Kado Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2011-08-30 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Deborah M Kado; Mei-Hua Huang; Arun S Karlamangla; Peggy Cawthon; Wendy Katzman; Teresa A Hillier; Kristine Ensrud; Steven R Cummings Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 6.741