Literature DB >> 16481902

The cost of developing imaging agents for routine clinical use.

Adrian D Nunn1.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to estimate the financial cost of developing new imaging agents for clinical use and to discuss the effects of these costs on the future clinical imaging agent environment. Publicly available financial data from the annual reports of major companies developing and selling imaging agents were examined and the data used to develop cost estimates. These estimates were compared with the in-depth data and analyses available for the development costs of therapeutic drugs. The cost of developing a drug for diagnostic imaging to commercialization is in the 100 dollars to 200 million dollars range, whereas a blockbuster imaging drug has current sales of 200 dollars to 400 million dollars. Most of these blockbuster imaging agents have been on the market for some time. The majority provide morphologic images with general indications in a slowly changing section of the market. Future agents will most likely address smaller markets and be in the rapidly developing molecular imaging field. The costs are high and are a significant brake on the development of imaging agents for commercialization. If new imaging agents are to realize their commercial potential, ways must be found to make the financials more attractive. The prices per dose are currently low so they must either be greatly increased for new imaging agents, with a corresponding increase in the value of the information they provide, or the use of imaging agents must be widened and/or their development made less costly in time and money. Without addressing these issues, the commercialization of new imaging agents will continue to be slow and may get slower. This will impact the progress of imaging agents toward use as validated biomarkers.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16481902     DOI: 10.1097/01.rli.0000191370.52737.75

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  21 in total

1.  Vision 20/20: Molecular-guided surgical oncology based upon tumor metabolism or immunologic phenotype: Technological pathways for point of care imaging and intervention.

Authors:  Brian W Pogue; Keith D Paulsen; Kimberley S Samkoe; Jonathan T Elliott; Tayyaba Hasan; Theresa V Strong; Daniel R Draney; Joachim Feldwisch
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  The evolution of imaging in cancer: current state and future challenges.

Authors:  Luke J Higgins; Martin G Pomper
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.929

3.  Photons across medicine: relating optical and nuclear imaging.

Authors:  Robert Nordstrom; Simon Cherry; Ali Azhdarinia; Eva Sevick-Muraca; Henry Vanbrocklin
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 4.  Analysis of FDA-approved imaging agents.

Authors:  Michael S Kinch; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 7.851

Review 5.  Targeted nanotechnology for cancer imaging.

Authors:  Randall Toy; Lisa Bauer; Christopher Hoimes; Ketan B Ghaghada; Efstathios Karathanasis
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2014-08-09       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 6.  Technology Insight: novel imaging of molecular targets is an emerging area crucial to the development of targeted drugs.

Authors:  Wolfgang A Weber; Johannes Czernin; Michael E Phelps; Harvey R Herschman
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Oncol       Date:  2008-01

Review 7.  Molecular imaging for cancer diagnosis and surgery.

Authors:  Timon Hussain; Quyen T Nguyen
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2013-09-22       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 8.  Fluorescence-guided surgery with live molecular navigation--a new cutting edge.

Authors:  Quyen T Nguyen; Roger Y Tsien
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 9.  Progress in molecular imaging in endoscopy and endomicroscopy for cancer imaging.

Authors:  Supang Khondee; Thomas D Wang
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.682

10.  Heterobivalent dual-target probe for targeting GRP and Y1 receptors on tumor cells.

Authors:  Ajay Shrivastava; Shu-Huei Wang; Natarajan Raju; Izabela Gierach; Haiming Ding; Michael F Tweedle
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 2.823

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.