Literature DB >> 16481801

Objective sizing of upper airway stenosis: a quantitative endoscopic approach.

S A R Nouraei1, D W McPartlin, S M Nouraei, A Patel, C Ferguson, D J Howard, G S Sandhu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In patients with airway stenosis, anatomy of the lesion determines the magnitude of the biomechanical ventilatory disturbance and thus the nature and severity of symptoms. It also gives information about biology, likelihood of response to treatment, and prognosis of laryngotracheal lesions. Accurate airway sizing throughout treatment is therefore central to managing this condition. We developed a method for objective assessment of airway lesions during endoscopy.
METHODS: We used airway simulations to investigate the effects of endoscope tilt and lens distortions on measurement accuracy, devising and validating clinical rules for quantitative airway endoscopy. A calibrator was designed to assess lesion length, location, and cross-section during tracheoscopy.
RESULTS: It proved possible to calculate the length and location of the stenosis using simple mathematics. Cross-section measurements were more than 95% accurate, independent of endoscope tilt and without making assumptions about endoscope optics and visuospatial distortion, for both pediatric and adult airway dimensions. The technique was used to characterize airway lesions in 10 adult patients with an average age of 48 years undergoing therapeutic laryngotracheoscopy. Lesions occurred on average 36 mm below the glottis (range, 21-54 mm) and were 9.3 mm long (5-17 mm). The average pretreatment airway cross-section was 48.3 mm, increasing to 141.1 mm after laser therapy. Two independent observers calculated airway cross-sections, achieving an interobserver concordance of 0.98.
CONCLUSIONS: This method can be used to objectively and precisely determine the anatomy of airway lesions, allowing accurate documentation of lesion characteristics and surgical results, serial monitoring throughout treatment, and comparison of outcomes between different centers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16481801     DOI: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000186657.62474.88

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  11 in total

1.  Laryngo-tracheal profile: a new method for assessing laryngo-tracheal stenoses.

Authors:  Karl Kiesler; Markus Gugatschka; Erich Sorantin; Gerhard Friedrich
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Quantitative Evaluation of Adult Subglottic Stenosis Using Intraoperative Long-range Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  Giriraj K Sharma; Anthony Chin Loy; Erica Su; Joe Jing; Zhongping Chen; Brian J-F Wong; Sunil Verma
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 1.547

3.  Toward online quantification of tracheal stenosis from videobronchoscopy.

Authors:  Carles Sánchez; Jorge Bernal; F Javier Sánchez; Marta Diez; Antoni Rosell; Debora Gil
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Real-time robotic airway measurement: An additional benefit of a novel steady-hand robotic platform.

Authors:  Christopher R Razavi; Francis X Creighton; Paul R Wilkening; Joseph Peine; Russell H Taylor; Lee M Akst
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Airway management and endoscopic treatment of subglottic and tracheal stenosis: the laryngeal mask airway technique.

Authors:  Nopawan Vorasubin; Darshni Vira; Nausheen Jamal; Dinesh K Chhetri
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.547

6.  Clinical validation and reproducibility of endoscopic airway measurement in pediatric aerodigestive evaluation.

Authors:  Christian R Francom; Cameron A Best; Ryan G Eaton; Victoria Pepper; Amanda J Onwuka; Christopher K Breuer; Meredith N Merz Lind; Jonathan M Grischkan; Tendy Chiang
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 1.675

7.  Comparison of endoscopic versus 3D CT derived airway measurements.

Authors:  Hollin E Calloway; Julia S Kimbell; Stephanie D Davis; George Z Retsch-Bogart; Elizabeth A Pitkin; Kathleen Abode; Richard Superfine; Carlton J Zdanski
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  MR Image Analytics to Characterize the Upper Airway Structure in Obese Children with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome.

Authors:  Yubing Tong; Jayaram K Udupa; Sanghun Sin; Zhengbing Liu; E Paul Wileyto; Drew A Torigian; Raanan Arens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Flexible nasopharyngolaryngoscopy: Evaluation and appraisal of its effectiveness and diagnostic yield, The Nigerian experience.

Authors:  Shuaib Kayode Aremu
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2019-10-31

10.  Reliability of peak expiratory flow percentage compared to endoscopic grading in subglottic stenosis.

Authors:  Sungjin A Song; Alena Santeerapharp; Kanittha Choksawad; Ramon A Franco
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-11-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.