Literature DB >> 16481688

Control of thermal therapies with moving power deposition field.

Dhiraj Arora1, Mark A Minor, Mikhail Skliar, Robert B Roemer.   

Abstract

A thermal therapy feedback control approach to control thermal dose using a moving power deposition field is developed and evaluated using simulations. A normal tissue safety objective is incorporated in the controller design by imposing constraints on temperature elevations at selected normal tissue locations. The proposed control technique consists of two stages. The first stage uses a model-based sliding mode controller that dynamically generates an 'ideal' power deposition profile which is generally unrealizable with available heating modalities. Subsequently, in order to approximately realize this spatially distributed idealized power deposition, a constrained quadratic optimizer is implemented to compute intensities and dwell times for a set of pre-selected power deposition fields created by a scanned focused transducer. The dwell times for various power deposition profiles are dynamically generated online as opposed to the commonly employed a priori-decided heating strategies. Dynamic intensity and trajectory generation safeguards the treatment outcome against modelling uncertainties and unknown disturbances. The controller is designed to enforce simultaneous activation of multiple normal tissue temperature constraints by rapidly switching between various power deposition profiles. The hypothesis behind the controller design is that the simultaneous activation of multiple constraints substantially reduces treatment time without compromising normal tissue safety. The controller performance and robustness with respect to parameter uncertainties is evaluated using simulations. The results demonstrate that the proposed controller can successfully deliver the desired thermal dose to the target while maintaining the temperatures at the user-specified normal tissue locations at or below the maximum allowable values. Although demonstrated for the case of a scanned focused ultrasound transducer, the developed approach can be extended to other heating modalities with moving deposition fields, such as external and interstitial ultrasound phased arrays, multiple radiofrequency needle applicators and microwave antennae.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16481688     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/5/011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  8 in total

Review 1.  High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound: Current Status for Image-Guided Therapy.

Authors:  Alexander Copelan; Jason Hartman; Monzer Chehab; Aradhana M Venkatesan
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 2.  MR-guided focused ultrasound surgery, present and future.

Authors:  David Schlesinger; Stanley Benedict; Chris Diederich; Wladyslaw Gedroyc; Alexander Klibanov; James Larner
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  Focused ultrasound surgery in oncology: overview and principles.

Authors:  Clare M C Tempany; Nathan J McDannold; Kullervo Hynynen; Ferenc A Jolesz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging-guided volumetric ablation of symptomatic leiomyomata: correlation of imaging with histology.

Authors:  Aradhana M Venkatesan; Ari Partanen; Tajana Klepac Pulanic; Matthew R Dreher; John Fischer; Robert K Zurawin; Raja Muthupillai; Sham Sokka; Heikki J Nieminen; Ninet Sinaii; Maria Merino; Bradford J Wood; Pamela Stratton
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 5.  Clinical and Technical Aspects of MR-Guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Treatment of Symptomatic Uterine Fibroids.

Authors:  Laura E Rueff; Steven S Raman
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.513

6.  Temporally constrained reconstruction applied to MRI temperature data.

Authors:  Nick Todd; Ganesh Adluru; Allison Payne; Edward V R DiBella; Dennis Parker
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Analytical estimation of ultrasound properties, thermal diffusivity, and perfusion using magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound temperature data.

Authors:  C R Dillon; G Borasi; A Payne
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  An MRI-compatible system for focused ultrasound experiments in small animal models.

Authors:  Rajiv Chopra; Laura Curiel; Robert Staruch; Laetitia Morrison; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.071

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.