Literature DB >> 16480896

A verifiable solution to the MEG inverse problem.

Gareth R Barnes1, Paul L Furlong, Krish D Singh, Arjan Hillebrand.   

Abstract

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a non-invasive brain imaging technique with the potential for very high temporal and spatial resolution of neuronal activity. The main stumbling block for the technique has been that the estimation of a neuronal current distribution, based on sensor data outside the head, is an inverse problem with an infinity of possible solutions. Many inversion techniques exist, all using different a-priori assumptions in order to reduce the number of possible solutions. Although all techniques can be thoroughly tested in simulation, implicit in the simulations are the experimenter's own assumptions about realistic brain function. To date, the only way to test the validity of inversions based on real MEG data has been through direct surgical validation, or through comparison with invasive primate data. In this work, we constructed a null hypothesis that the reconstruction of neuronal activity contains no information on the distribution of the cortical grey matter. To test this, we repeatedly compared rotated sections of grey matter with a beamformer estimate of neuronal activity to generate a distribution of mutual information values. The significance of the comparison between the un-rotated anatomical information and the electrical estimate was subsequently assessed against this distribution. We found that there was significant (P < 0.05) anatomical information contained in the beamformer images across a number of frequency bands. Based on the limited data presented here, we can say that the assumptions behind the beamformer algorithm are not unreasonable for the visual-motor task investigated.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16480896     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  6 in total

1.  Word repetition priming-induced oscillations in auditory cortex: a magnetoencephalography study.

Authors:  Kambiz Tavabi; David Embick; Timothy P L Roberts
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  A framework for the design of flexible cross-talk functions for spatial filtering of EEG/MEG data: DeFleCT.

Authors:  Olaf Hauk; Matti Stenroos
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Localization of MEG human brain responses to retinotopic visual stimuli with contrasting source reconstruction approaches.

Authors:  Nela Cicmil; Holly Bridge; Andrew J Parker; Mark W Woolrich; Kristine Krug
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Does function fit structure? A ground truth for non-invasive neuroimaging.

Authors:  Claire Stevenson; Matthew Brookes; José David López; Luzia Troebinger; Jeremie Mattout; William Penny; Peter Morris; Arjan Hillebrand; Richard Henson; Gareth Barnes
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Consistency of magnetoencephalographic functional connectivity and network reconstruction using a template versus native MRI for co-registration.

Authors:  Linda Douw; Dagmar Nieboer; Cornelis J Stam; Prejaas Tewarie; Arjan Hillebrand
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-10-08       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  On the Potential of a New Generation of Magnetometers for MEG: A Beamformer Simulation Study.

Authors:  Elena Boto; Richard Bowtell; Peter Krüger; T Mark Fromhold; Peter G Morris; Sofie S Meyer; Gareth R Barnes; Matthew J Brookes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.