Literature DB >> 16480570

Does personalized feedback improve the outcome of cognitive-behavioural guided self-care in bulimia nervosa? A preliminary randomized controlled trial.

Ulrike Schmidt1, Sabine Landau, Maria Guadelupe Pombo-Carril, Nuria Bara-Carril, Yael Reid, Kathryn Murray, Janet Treasure, Melanie Katzman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Feedback has long been a part of psychosocial and health behaviour interventions and with the advent of computerised assessment and treatment tools, is gaining greater importance. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the addition of personalized feedback to a guided cognitive-behavioural (CBT) self-help programme for patients with bulimia nervosa.
DESIGN: Randomised-controlled trial.
METHOD: 61 patients with DSM-IV bulimia nervosa or eating disorder not otherwise specified (EDNOS) were randomly allocated to receive 14 sessions of cognitive behavioural guided self-care with or without added personalised feedback on current physical and psychological status, risk and problems, and variables facilitating or hindering change. Feedback to patients was delivered in a number of ways: (a) personalised letters after assessment and at the end of treatment, (b) a specially designed feedback form administered half-way through treatment, (c) computerised feedback about bulimic and other symptoms, such as anxiety, depression and interpersonal functioning repeated at intervals throughout treatment and follow-up.
RESULTS: Outcome was assessed using patient-rated measures of bulimic symptoms at the end of treatment and at 6-month follow-up. The data were analysed using maximum likelihood methods of assess group differences at the follow-up. Added feedback did not have an effect on take-up or drop-out from treatment. However, it improved outcome by reducing self-induced vomiting and dietary restriction more effectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings lend support to the notion that the addition of repeated personalised feedback improves outcome from guided CBT self-help treatment and deserves further study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16480570     DOI: 10.1348/014466505X29143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Psychol        ISSN: 0144-6657


  11 in total

Review 1.  Routine provision of feedback from patient-reported outcome measurements to healthcare providers and patients in clinical practice.

Authors:  Chris Gibbons; Ian Porter; Daniela C Gonçalves-Bradley; Stanimir Stoilov; Ignacio Ricci-Cabello; Elena Tsangaris; Jaheeda Gangannagaripalli; Antoinette Davey; Elizabeth J Gibbons; Anna Kotzeva; Jonathan Evans; Philip J van der Wees; Evangelos Kontopantelis; Joanne Greenhalgh; Peter Bower; Jordi Alonso; Jose M Valderas
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-10-12

Review 2.  The relationship between eating disorder not otherwise specified (EDNOS) and officially recognized eating disorders: meta-analysis and implications for DSM.

Authors:  Jennifer J Thomas; Lenny R Vartanian; Kelly D Brownell
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 3.  Cognitive-behavioural therapy for individuals with bulimia nervosa and a co-occurring substance use disorder.

Authors:  Robyn Sysko; Tom Hildebrandt
Journal:  Eur Eat Disord Rev       Date:  2009-03

Review 4.  Psychological treatments for bulimia nervosa and binging.

Authors:  Phillipa Pj Hay; Josué Bacaltchuk; Sergio Stefano; Priyanka Kashyap
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-10-07

5.  Motivation to change in recent onset and long-standing bulimia nervosa: are there differences?

Authors:  S Perkins; U Schmidt; I Eisler; J Treasure; M Berelowitz; E Dodge; S Frost; M Jenkins; E Johnson-Sabine; S Keville; R Murphy; P Robinson; S Winn; I Yi
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.652

6.  Feedback versus no feedback in improving patient outcome in group psychotherapy for eating disorders (F-EAT): protocol for a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Annika Helgadóttir Davidsen; Stig Poulsen; Mette Waaddegaard; Jane Lindschou; Marianne Lau
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Dealing with daily challenges in dementia (deal-id study): effectiveness of the experience sampling method intervention 'Partner in Sight' for spousal caregivers of people with dementia: design of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Rosalia J M van Knippenberg; Marjolein E de Vugt; Rudolf W Ponds; Inez Myin-Germeys; Frans R J Verhey
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.630

8.  Computerised therapy for depression with clinician vs. assistant and brief vs. extended phone support: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Lina Gega; Louise Swift; Garry Barton; Gillian Todd; Nesta Reeve; Kelly Bird; Richard Holland; Amanda Howe; Jon Wilson; Jo Molle
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 9.  Feedback from Outcome Measures and Treatment Effectiveness, Treatment Efficiency, and Collaborative Practice: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Dawid Gondek; Julian Edbrooke-Childs; Elian Fink; Jessica Deighton; Miranda Wolpert
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2016-05

Review 10.  Effectiveness of psychosocial interventions in eating disorders: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews.

Authors:  Marcelle Barrueco Costa; Tamara Melnik
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.