OBJECTIVES: Persons with high levels of paranoid ideation may be more sensitive to emotional stimuli, particularly negative emotions, reflecting the operation of a paranoid schema. However, this finding has not been consistently supported and needs further study. This study examined the effect of paranoia, as measured on a continuum, on emotion perception. It was predicted that higher levels of paranoia would be associated with improved emotion perception scores with better recognition for negative emotions than positive. DESIGN: A four-group ANOVA design was used to compare participants with clinical and sub-clinical paranoia to reflect the continuum view of paranoia. METHODS: A group with persecutory delusions (N=30) was compared with three sub-clinical groups (N=88) on two posed emotion perception tasks. The sub-clinical participants were divided into high, moderate, and low groups based on scores from the Paranoia Scale, a widely used measure of sub-clinical paranoia. RESULTS: Persons with persecutory delusions had lower overall emotion perception scores than all of the sub-clinical groups. For negative emotions, persons with persecutory delusions had lower identification scores than the moderate and low sub-clinical groups, but were no different than the high sub-clinical group. Anger was especially problematic for clinical participants. There were no differences for positive emotions. CONCLUSIONS: Instead of an enhanced sensitivity for the recognition of emotional states, higher levels of paranoia were linked to a performance deficit on emotion perception tasks. The deficits in emotion perception may reflect the increased skepticism and scrutiny associated with posed emotion tasks (Davis & Gibson, 2000). Research should begin to focus on the underlying mechanisms of emotion perception deficits in paranoia.
OBJECTIVES:Persons with high levels of paranoid ideation may be more sensitive to emotional stimuli, particularly negative emotions, reflecting the operation of a paranoid schema. However, this finding has not been consistently supported and needs further study. This study examined the effect of paranoia, as measured on a continuum, on emotion perception. It was predicted that higher levels of paranoia would be associated with improved emotion perception scores with better recognition for negative emotions than positive. DESIGN: A four-group ANOVA design was used to compare participants with clinical and sub-clinical paranoia to reflect the continuum view of paranoia. METHODS: A group with persecutory delusions (N=30) was compared with three sub-clinical groups (N=88) on two posed emotion perception tasks. The sub-clinical participants were divided into high, moderate, and low groups based on scores from the Paranoia Scale, a widely used measure of sub-clinical paranoia. RESULTS:Persons with persecutory delusions had lower overall emotion perception scores than all of the sub-clinical groups. For negative emotions, persons with persecutory delusions had lower identification scores than the moderate and low sub-clinical groups, but were no different than the high sub-clinical group. Anger was especially problematic for clinical participants. There were no differences for positive emotions. CONCLUSIONS: Instead of an enhanced sensitivity for the recognition of emotional states, higher levels of paranoia were linked to a performance deficit on emotion perception tasks. The deficits in emotion perception may reflect the increased skepticism and scrutiny associated with posed emotion tasks (Davis & Gibson, 2000). Research should begin to focus on the underlying mechanisms of emotion perception deficits in paranoia.
Authors: Dennis R Combs; Aneta Tosheva; David L Penn; Michael R Basso; Jill L Wanner; Kristen Laib Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2008-06-27 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Laura A Steenhuis; Gerdina H M Pijnenborg; Elisabeth C D van der Stouwe; Catharina A Hartman; André Aleman; Agna A Bartels-Velthuis; Maaike H Nauta Journal: Child Psychiatry Hum Dev Date: 2020-04
Authors: Pedro Bendala-Rodríguez; Cristina Senín-Calderón; Leonardo Peluso-Crespi; Juan F Rodríguez-Testal Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2019-11-13 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Joscelyn E Fisher; Gregory A Miller; Sarah M Sass; Rebecca Levin Silton; J Christopher Edgar; Jennifer L Stewart; Jing Zhou; Wendy Heller Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2014-06-27
Authors: Stephan Furger; Antje Stahnke; Francilia Zengaffinen; Andrea Federspiel; Yosuke Morishima; Martina Papmeyer; Roland Wiest; Thomas Dierks; Werner Strik Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2020-04-25 Impact factor: 4.881