Literature DB >> 16479242

FDG PET positive lymph nodes are highly predictive of metastasis in breast cancer.

Rakesh Kumar1, Hongming Zhuang, Mitchell Schnall, Emily Conant, Stephanie Damia, Susan Weinstein, Prem Chandra, Brain Czerniecki, Abass Alavi.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine whether or not fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) imaging when positive could obviate the necessity for sentinel lymph node biopsy and for complete axillary node dissection in patients with breast cancer.
METHODS: A total of 80 female patients with a histological diagnosis of breast cancer and clinically negative axillary nodes underwent an FDG PET and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or total axillary dissection for staging of axilla. Both SLNB and axillary dissection were performed in 72 patients, while eight patients had total axillary dissection without SLN biopsy.
RESULTS: Of the 80 patients, 36 had lymph node metastasis on histopathology. SLNB was positive for metastasis in 35 (97%) of 36 patients (29 macrometastasis and seven micrometastasis). In the patient with false negative SLNB, the lymph node was completely replaced by the tumour. The FDG PET was true positive in 16 of 36 patients (sensitivity, 44%). There were two false positive studies with FDG PET, resulting in a specificity of 95%. The positive predictive value and accuracy of FDG PET for the detection of axillary lymph node metastasis were 89% and 72%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that higher grade of tumour, increased size and number of axillary lymph nodes were significantly associated with positive FDG PET results for axillary staging.
CONCLUSION: FDG PET cannot replace histological staging using SLNB in patients with breast cancer. However, FDG PET has a high specificity and positive predictive value for staging of the axilla in these patients. The patients with higher grade of tumour, larger size and higher number of axillary lymph nodes may be considered for FDG PET scan for axillary staging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16479242     DOI: 10.1097/00006231-200603000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucl Med Commun        ISSN: 0143-3636            Impact factor:   1.690


  16 in total

1.  Investigation of 18F-FDG PET in the selection of patients with breast cancer as candidates for sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Laura Gilardi; Concetta De Cicco; Marco Colleoni; Anna Cardillo; Emilia Montagna; Silvia Dellapasqua; Viviana Galimberti; Vincenzo Bagnardi; Giovanni Paganelli
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  [Non-invasive imaging modalities for preoperative axillary lymph node staging in patients with breast cancer].

Authors:  K Wasser; A Schnitzer; J Brade; S O Schoenberg
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Preoperative FDG PET/CT in breast cancer patients: where are we going?

Authors:  Laura Gilardi; Concetta De Cicco; Giovanni Paganelli
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Regulation of the Warburg effect in early-passage breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Ian F Robey; Renu M Stephen; Kathy S Brown; Brenda K Baggett; Robert A Gatenby; Robert J Gillies
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 5.  A systematic review of FDG-PET in breast cancer.

Authors:  S Escalona; J A Blasco; M M Reza; E Andradas; N Gómez
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 6.  Can Complete Axillary Node Dissection Be Safely Omitted in Patients with Early Breast Cancer When the Sentinel Node Biopsy Is Positive for Malignancy? An Update for Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Ritika Gera; Abdul Kasem; Kefah Mokbel
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

7.  Unusual Contralateral Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in a Second Primary Breast Cancer Detected by FDG PET/CT and Lymphoscintigraphy.

Authors:  Ji-Young Kim; Hyunjong Lee; Tae Sung Kim; Han-Sung Kang; Seok-Ki Kim
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-08-11

8.  Accuracy of clinical evaluation of locally advanced breast cancer in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Raquel Prati; Christina A Minami; Jeff A Gornbein; Nanette Debruhl; Debbie Chung; Helena R Chang
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 9.  Advances in molecular imaging for breast cancer detection and characterization.

Authors:  Jennifer M Specht; David A Mankoff
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  The Effects of Preoperative (18)F-FDG PET/CT in Breast Cancer Patients in Comparison to the Conventional Imaging Study.

Authors:  Young Jin Choi; Young Duck Shin; Yoon Hee Kang; Moon Soo Lee; Min Koo Lee; Byung Sun Cho; Yoon Jung Kang; Ju Seung Park
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 3.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.