Literature DB >> 16479113

Laparoscopic staging in gallbladder cancer.

Shaleen Agrawal1, Rajendra N Sonawane, Anu Behari, Ashok Kumar, Sadiq S Sikora, Rajan Saxena, Vinay K Kapoor.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Laparoscopy is beneficial in the staging of pancreatic and upper gastrointestinal malignancies but its role in gallbladder cancer has not been investigated. We evaluated the role of laparoscopy in the staging of gallbladder cancer.
METHODS: From 1989 through 2001, 91 patients with gallbladder cancer, without any evidence of metastatic disease on imaging (ultrasound and/or computed tomographic scan), underwent staging laparoscopy. Peritoneal and surface liver metastases were looked for and assessment of local spread was done if possible. Assessment was based on visual impression and biopsies were not obtained routinely.
RESULTS: At laparoscopy, 34 (37%) patients had disseminated disease in the form of liver and/or peritoneal deposits; no further surgery was performed in 29 of these patients while 5 patients underwent surgical bypass procedures. Liver metastases were missed at laparoscopy in 2 patients and were subsequently found at laparotomy. Assessment of the gallbladder mass was possible in 33 (36%) patients, 6 of these were found to have extensive local disease and did not undergo any further surgery. Laparoscopic staging, thus avoided further surgery in 35 (38%) patients. Of the 51 patients without metastatic disease, who underwent laparotomy, 11 were found to have nonresectable locally advanced disease while 1 had liver metastases, which were missed at laparoscopy; 7 underwent bypass procedures only; 21 underwent simple cholecystectomy and extended cholecystectomy was done in 11 patients. The resectability rate (number of resections/operations) in patients undergoing laparoscopic staging was 57% (32/56) as compared with 43% (142/328) in those who did not undergo laparoscopy.
CONCLUSIONS: Staging laparoscopy in patients with gallbladder cancer detected liver and peritoneal metastases that were missed on imaging. It reduced the number of unnecessary surgical explorations and improved the resectability rate. Copyright (c) 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16479113     DOI: 10.1159/000091447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Surg        ISSN: 0253-4886            Impact factor:   2.588


  5 in total

Review 1.  Gallbladder carcinoma incidentally encountered during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: how to deal with it.

Authors:  Ketao Jin; Huanrong Lan; Tieming Zhu; Kuifeng He; Lisong Teng
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  A prospective analysis of the preoperative assessment of duodenal involvement in gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  Raja Kalayarasan; Amit Javed; Amarender S Puri; Sunil K Puri; Puja Sakhuja; Anil K Agarwal
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  The role of laparoscopic staging in patients with incidental gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  Jean M Butte; Mithat Gönen; Peter J Allen; Michael I D'Angelica; T Peter Kingham; Yuman Fong; Ronald P Dematteo; Leslie Blumgart; William R Jarnagin
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Evaluation of a prospective surgical strategy of extended resection to achieve R0 status in gall bladder cancer.

Authors:  Biju Pottakkat; Abhimanyu Kapoor; Anand Prakash; Rajneesh Kumar Singh; Anu Behari; Ashok Kumar; Vinay K Kapoor; Rajan Saxena
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2013-03

5.  Validation of revised American Joint Committee on Cancer staging for gallbladder cancer based on a single institution experience.

Authors:  Christina Y Koh; Aram N Demirjian; Wen-Pin Chen; Christine E McLaren; David K Imagawa
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 0.688

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.