| Literature DB >> 16479072 |
Seok-Beom Hong1, Sheng-Yu Jin, Hae-Jeong Park, Joo-Ho Jung, Woo-Young Sim.
Abstract
Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) levels are increased in scalp lesions of patients with alopecia areata (AA), suggesting a role in the development of AA. Recently, a biallelic A/G polymorphism in the MCP-1 promoter at position -2518 has been found, influencing the level of MCP-1 expression in response to an inflammatory stimulus. We investigated whether the presence of these polymorphisms were associated with AA in Korean population. 145 Korean patients with AA, 246 healthy subjects without clinical evidence of AA were screened for genotype with a PCR-based assay. In the AA patients the frequency of the A and G alleles was 40.3 and 59.7%, respectively and the distribution of the A/A, A/G and G/G genotypes was 19.3, 42.1 and 38.6%, respectively. Amongst the controls the frequency of the A and G alleles was 39.8 and 60.2%, and the distribution of the A/A, A/G, G/G genotypes in the same group was 17.5, 44.7 and 37.8%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the allele frequencies and genotype distributions between the patients and the controls (p=0.889, p=0.848, respectively). Our data indicates that no association exists between the -2518A/G polymorphism of the MCP-1 gene and susceptibility to alopecia areata.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2006 PMID: 16479072 PMCID: PMC2733986 DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2006.21.1.90
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Korean Med Sci ISSN: 1011-8934 Impact factor: 2.153
Clinical characteristics of the 145 Korean alopecia areata patients and healthy controls
AA, alopecia areata; AT, alopecia totalis; AU, alopecia universalis.
Distribution of alleles and genotypes for the A/G SNP in MCP-1 in alopecia areata and control population
*Observed vs. expected according to the Hardy-Weinberg equation, †Controls vs. patients using the chi-square test with 2×2 contingency table, ‡Controls vs. patients using the chi-square test with 3×2 contingency table.
Comparison of genotype distributions between each subgroup and the control population
*Controls vs. patients using the chi-square test with 3×2 contingency table.
Comparison of allele frequencies between each subgroup and the control population
*Controls vs. patients using the chi-square test with 2×2 contingency table.