Thomas E Dolmage1, Roger S Goldstein. 1. Department of Respiratory Diagnostic and Evaluation Services, West Park Healthcare Centre, 82 Buttonwood Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M6M 2J5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In patients with COPD, exercise intensity is often limited by the ventilatory system. We hypothesized that by exercising with a smaller muscle mass, ventilatory-limited patients would perform more high-intensity, muscle-specific work. The study objectives were as follows: (1) to determine the limitations of exercising with a smaller muscle mass, compared with conventional two-legged exercise; and (2) to determine the endurance time, using the same muscle-specific intensity, during one-legged vs two-legged exercise. METHODS: Nine patients (mean +/- SD FEV1, 36 +/- 13% of predicted) completed incremental exercise, and nine other patients (mean FEV1, 42 +/- 16% of predicted) completed constant-power exercise. Nine healthy subjects (FEV1, 104 +/- 14% of predicted) completed both tests. All subjects completed tests using two-legged and one-legged pedaling. RESULTS: Peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) was similar during one-legged and two-legged incremental exercise among patients (difference, 0.03 L/min; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.10 to 0.16 L/min; p = 0.60), as were ventilation and dyspnea scores. VO2peak was lower during one-legged vs two-legged exercise (-0.57 mL/min; 95% CI, -0.81 to -0.32 mL/min; p < 0.001) among healthy subjects with substantial ventilatory and heart rate reserve. Patients endured one-legged pedaling at a constant power longer than two-legged pedaling (16.97 min; 95% CI, 9.98 to 23.96 min; p < 0.001), resulting in greater work (12.48 kilojoules [kJ]; 95% CI, 2.58 to 22.39 kJ; p = 0.02). Healthy subjects completed similar work (-4.02 kJ; 95% CI, -18.59 to 10.55 kJ; p = 0.54) with one-legged vs two-legged pedaling. CONCLUSION: These observations demonstrate the effectiveness of using one-legged exercise at the same muscle-specific intensity in extending the duration of exercise among patients with COPD. This has important implications for training approaches designed to enhance exercise function among ventilatory-limited patients.
BACKGROUND: In patients with COPD, exercise intensity is often limited by the ventilatory system. We hypothesized that by exercising with a smaller muscle mass, ventilatory-limited patients would perform more high-intensity, muscle-specific work. The study objectives were as follows: (1) to determine the limitations of exercising with a smaller muscle mass, compared with conventional two-legged exercise; and (2) to determine the endurance time, using the same muscle-specific intensity, during one-legged vs two-legged exercise. METHODS: Nine patients (mean +/- SD FEV1, 36 +/- 13% of predicted) completed incremental exercise, and nine other patients (mean FEV1, 42 +/- 16% of predicted) completed constant-power exercise. Nine healthy subjects (FEV1, 104 +/- 14% of predicted) completed both tests. All subjects completed tests using two-legged and one-legged pedaling. RESULTS: Peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) was similar during one-legged and two-legged incremental exercise among patients (difference, 0.03 L/min; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.10 to 0.16 L/min; p = 0.60), as were ventilation and dyspnea scores. VO2peak was lower during one-legged vs two-legged exercise (-0.57 mL/min; 95% CI, -0.81 to -0.32 mL/min; p < 0.001) among healthy subjects with substantial ventilatory and heart rate reserve. Patients endured one-legged pedaling at a constant power longer than two-legged pedaling (16.97 min; 95% CI, 9.98 to 23.96 min; p < 0.001), resulting in greater work (12.48 kilojoules [kJ]; 95% CI, 2.58 to 22.39 kJ; p = 0.02). Healthy subjects completed similar work (-4.02 kJ; 95% CI, -18.59 to 10.55 kJ; p = 0.54) with one-legged vs two-legged pedaling. CONCLUSION: These observations demonstrate the effectiveness of using one-legged exercise at the same muscle-specific intensity in extending the duration of exercise among patients with COPD. This has important implications for training approaches designed to enhance exercise function among ventilatory-limited patients.
Authors: Martin J MacInnis; Evelyn Zacharewicz; Brian J Martin; Maria E Haikalis; Lauren E Skelly; Mark A Tarnopolsky; Robyn M Murphy; Martin J Gibala Journal: J Physiol Date: 2016-08-03 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Thomas E Dolmage; Tom Reilly; Neil J Greening; Sally Majd; Bhavesh Popat; Sanjay Agarwal; Felix A Woodhead; Rachael A Evans Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2020-02
Authors: François Maltais; Marc Decramer; Richard Casaburi; Esther Barreiro; Yan Burelle; Richard Debigaré; P N Richard Dekhuijzen; Frits Franssen; Ghislaine Gayan-Ramirez; Joaquim Gea; Harry R Gosker; Rik Gosselink; Maurice Hayot; Sabah N A Hussain; Wim Janssens; Micheal I Polkey; Josep Roca; Didier Saey; Annemie M W J Schols; Martijn A Spruit; Michael Steiner; Tanja Taivassalo; Thierry Troosters; Ioannis Vogiatzis; Peter D Wagner Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2014-05-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Siri Bjørgen; Jan Hoff; Vigdis S Husby; Morten A Høydal; Arnt E Tjønna; Sigurd Steinshamn; Russell S Richardson; Jan Helgerud Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2009-04-01 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Martijn A Spruit; Chris Burtin; Patrick De Boever; Daniël Langer; Ioannis Vogiatzis; Emiel F M Wouters; Frits M E Franssen Journal: Breathe (Sheff) Date: 2016-06