Literature DB >> 16478809

Tolerance of vancomycin for surgical prophylaxis in patients undergoing cardiac surgery and incidence of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus colonization.

Sumesh Kachroo1, Thanh Dao, Firas Zabaneh, Margaret Reiter, Mark T Larocco, Layne O Gentry, Kevin W Garey.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2001, vancomycin replaced cefuroxime for antibiotic prophylaxis in patients undergoing cardiac surgery at our institution due to high rates of surgical site infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus spp. However, few data supported the use of vancomycin for surgical prophylaxis.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the tolerance of vancomycin for antibiotic prophylaxis and incidence of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) in cardiac surgery patients.
METHODS: In 2 separate studies, we assessed the adverse effects in patients given perioperative vancomycin (study 1) and the incidence of VRE in patients given perioperative vancomycin (study 2). Study 1 was a prospective cohort study of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or valve replacement surgery given vancomycin (1 dose preoperatively/2 doses postoperatively) for antibiotic prophylaxis between October 2003 and December 2004. Patients were assessed for tolerance to the antibiotic regimen. In study 2, cardiac surgery patients receiving perioperative vancomycin were screened for VRE before therapy and at day 7 of hospitalization. VRE was detected using standard microbiologic procedures.
RESULTS: In study 1, 1161 patients (CABG = 75%; valve = 19%; both = 6%) were evaluated. All patients but one (99.9%) were prescribed preoperative vancomycin. Therapy was changed for 34 (2.9%) patients, of which 20 changes were due to physician preference for another antibiotic. The only toxicity that required a change in the vancomycin regimen was red man's syndrome, which was experienced by 9 (0.8%) patients. Four patients did not receive a second postoperative dose due to prior renal insufficiency. Patients were most commonly switched to cefuroxime (n = 26), linezolid (n = 2), cefepime (n = 2), gatifloxacin, cefazolin, levofloxacin, or ceftriaxone (n = 1, each). In study 2, 100 patients were screened for the emergence of VRE colonization. No patient was VRE positive at baseline and 4 (4%) were positive at day 7.
CONCLUSIONS: Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis with vancomycin was reasonably well tolerated in CABG and valve replacement surgery, with a 4% incidence of VRE colonization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16478809     DOI: 10.1345/aph.1G565

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Pharmacother        ISSN: 1060-0280            Impact factor:   3.154


  9 in total

1.  The use of broad-spectrum antibiotics reduces the incidence of surgical site infection after pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Kimitaka Tanaka; Toru Nakamura; Shungo Imai; Hiroki Kushiya; Daisuke Miyasaka; Yoshitsugu Nakanishi; Toshimichi Asano; Takehiro Noji; Takahiro Tsuchikawa; Keisuke Okamura; Toshiaki Shichinohe; Satoshi Hirano
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Impact of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus prevalence among S. aureus isolates on surgical site infection risk after coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  Loren G Miller; James A McKinnell; Michael E Vollmer; Brad Spellberg
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.254

3.  Very early infective endocarditis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Vassili Panagides; Mohamed Abdel-Wahab; Norman Mangner; Eric Durand; Nikolaj Ihlemann; Marina Urena; Costanza Pellegrini; Francesco Giannini; Piotr Scislo; Zenon Huczek; Martin Landt; Vincent Auffret; Jan Malte Sinning; Asim N Cheema; Luis Nombela-Franco; Chekrallah Chamandi; Francisco Campelo-Parada; Erika Munoz-Garcia; Howard C Herrmann; Luca Testa; Won-Keun Kim; Helene Eltchaninoff; Lars Søndergaard; Dominique Himbert; Oliver Husser; Azeem Latib; Hervé Le Breton; Clement Servoz; Philippe Gervais; David Del Val; Axel Linke; Lisa Crusius; Holger Thiele; David Holzhey; Josep Rodés-Cabau
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 6.138

4.  Vancomycin flush as antibiotic prophylaxis for early catheter-related infections: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Nicolas Penel; Yazdan Yazdanpanah
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 5.  Preventing deep wound infection after coronary artery bypass grafting: a review.

Authors:  Charles S Bryan; William M Yarbrough
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2013

6.  Interrupted time series analysis of vancomycin compared to cefuroxime for surgical prophylaxis in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Authors:  K W Garey; D Lai; T K Dao-Tran; L O Gentry; L Y Hwang; B R Davis
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Kytococcus schroeteri: a probably underdiagnosed pathogen involved in prosthetic valve endocarditis.

Authors:  Christian Aepinus; Esther Adolph; Christof von Eiff; Andreas Podbielski; Michael Petzsch
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.704

8.  Surgical site infection prophylaxis strategies for cardiothoracic surgery: a decision-analytic model.

Authors:  Keith S Kaye; Scott T Devine; Kimbal D Ford; Deverick J Anderson
Journal:  Scand J Infect Dis       Date:  2012-07-25

9.  Multicentre randomised double-blind placebo controlled trial of combination vancomycin and cefazolin surgical antibiotic prophylaxis: the Australian surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (ASAP) trial.

Authors:  Trisha Peel; Sarah Astbury; Allen C Cheng; David Paterson; Kirsty Buising; Tim Spelman; An Tran-Duy; Richard S de Steiger
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-11-03       Impact factor: 2.692

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.