Literature DB >> 1647813

Transcriptional regulation of the int-2 gene in embryonal carcinoma cells.

D Grinberg1, J Thurlow, R Watson, R Smith, G Peters, C Dickson.   

Abstract

The int-2 gene, which encodes a member of the fibroblast growth factor family, is expressed at specific sites and times during mouse development. In certain embryonal carcinoma cell lines, multiple int-2 transcripts accumulate when the cells are induced to differentiate with retinoic acid and dibutyryl cyclic AMP. Nuclear run-on analyses indicate that the apparent induction of int-2 expression results from an increase in the rate of transcription initiation. Six distinct types of RNA have been delineated, originating from three promoters and terminating at either of two polyadenylation sites. Since each transcript appears to encode the same protein, this complexity may reflect the need for lineage-specific or differentiation-dependent control of expression. By comparing the kinetics of induction and turnover of the different RNA species, we show that the choice of promoter or length of the 3'-untranslated region has no significant effect on the half-lives of the various mRNAs. To further evaluate control at the transcriptional level, we have shown that a 1.7-kilobase fragment of int-2 genomic DNA, when fused to the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene, can act as a regulated promoter(s) in differentiated versus undifferentiated embryonal carcinoma cells. This segment of DNA encompasses the three promoter regions previously delineated by RNase mapping plus about 900 base pairs of additional upstream sequences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1647813

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Growth Differ        ISSN: 1044-9523


  8 in total

1.  GATA-4 interacts distinctively with negative and positive regulatory elements in the Fgf-3 promoter.

Authors:  Akira Murakami; Sanami Ishida; Clive Dickson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 2.  An analysis of vertebrate mRNA sequences: intimations of translational control.

Authors:  M Kozak
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 10.539

3.  Expression of Fgf-3 in relation to hindbrain segmentation, otic pit position and pharyngeal arch morphology in normal and retinoic acid-exposed mouse embryos.

Authors:  R Mahmood; I J Mason; G M Morriss-Kay
Journal:  Anat Embryol (Berl)       Date:  1996-07

Review 4.  Alternative poly(A) site selection in complex transcription units: means to an end?

Authors:  G Edwalds-Gilbert; K L Veraldi; C Milcarek
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Identification of positive and negative regulatory elements involved in the retinoic acid/cAMP induction of Fgf-3 transcription in F9 cells.

Authors:  A Murakami; D Grinberg; J Thurlow; C Dickson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1993-11-25       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  SOX6 binds CtBP2 to repress transcription from the Fgf-3 promoter.

Authors:  A Murakami; S Ishida; J Thurlow; J M Revest; C Dickson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Mouse mammary tumor virus sequences responsible for activating cellular oncogenes.

Authors:  S L Grimm; S K Nordeen
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 5.103

8.  Competition between nuclear localization and secretory signals determines the subcellular fate of a single CUG-initiated form of FGF3.

Authors:  P Kiefer; P Acland; D Pappin; G Peters; C Dickson
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1994-09-01       Impact factor: 11.598

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.