Literature DB >> 16477622

On the nature of cavities on protein surfaces: application to the identification of drug-binding sites.

Murad Nayal1, Barry Honig.   

Abstract

In this article we introduce a new method for the identification and the accurate characterization of protein surface cavities. The method is encoded in the program SCREEN (Surface Cavity REcognition and EvaluatioN). As a first test of the utility of our approach we used SCREEN to locate and analyze the surface cavities of a nonredundant set of 99 proteins cocrystallized with drugs. We find that this set of proteins has on average about 14 distinct cavities per protein. In all cases, a drug is bound at one (and sometimes more than one) of these cavities. Using cavity size alone as a criterion for predicting drug-binding sites yields a high balanced error rate of 15.7%, with only 71.7% coverage. Here we characterize each surface cavity by computing a comprehensive set of 408 physicochemical, structural, and geometric attributes. By applying modern machine learning techniques (Random Forests) we were able to develop a classifier that can identify drug-binding cavities with a balanced error rate of 7.2% and coverage of 88.9%. Only 18 of the 408 cavity attributes had a statistically significant role in the prediction. Of these 18 important attributes, almost all involved size and shape rather than physicochemical properties of the surface cavity. The implications of these results are discussed. A SCREEN Web server is available at http://interface.bioc.columbia.edu/screen. 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16477622     DOI: 10.1002/prot.20897

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  92 in total

1.  Discrete molecular dynamics distinguishes nativelike binding poses from decoys in difficult targets.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Proctor; Shuangye Yin; Alexander Tropsha; Nikolay V Dokholyan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  Flexibility and binding affinity in protein-ligand, protein-protein and multi-component protein interactions: limitations of current computational approaches.

Authors:  Pierre Tuffery; Philippe Derreumaux
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Structural models in the assessment of protein druggability based on HTS data.

Authors:  Anvita Gupta; Arun Kumar Gupta; Kothandaraman Seshadri
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Lessons for fragment library design: analysis of output from multiple screening campaigns.

Authors:  I-Jen Chen; Roderick E Hubbard
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  What induces pocket openings on protein surface patches involved in protein-protein interactions?

Authors:  Susanne Eyrisch; Volkhard Helms
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2008-09-06       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Chasing funnels on protein-protein energy landscapes at different resolutions.

Authors:  Anatoly M Ruvinsky; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Solution NMR structure of CD1104B from pathogenic Clostridium difficile reveals a distinct α-helical architecture and provides first structural representative of protein domain family PF14203.

Authors:  Surya V S R K Pulavarti; Alexander Eletsky; Hsiau-Wei Lee; Thomas B Acton; Rong Xiao; John K Everett; James H Prestegard; Gaetano T Montelione; Thomas Szyperski
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2013-09-19

8.  Impact of point mutation P29S in RAC1 on tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Vidya Rajendran; Chandrasekhar Gopalakrishnan; Rituraj Purohit
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-10-03

Review 9.  Expanding the number of 'druggable' targets: non-enzymes and protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Leah N Makley; Jason E Gestwicki
Journal:  Chem Biol Drug Des       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.817

10.  Structure of a herpesvirus nuclear egress complex subunit reveals an interaction groove that is essential for viral replication.

Authors:  Kendra E Leigh; Mayuri Sharma; My Sam Mansueto; Andras Boeszoermenyi; David J Filman; James M Hogle; Gerhard Wagner; Donald M Coen; Haribabu Arthanari
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.