Literature DB >> 16477271

Resting energy expenditure and fuel metabolism following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in severely obese women: relationships with excess weight lost.

F Galtier1, A Farret, R Verdier, E Barbotte, D Nocca, J-M Fabre, J Bringer, E Renard.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although adjustable gastric banding is increasingly proposed for massively obese patients, little is known about the modifications of resting metabolic rate and substrate oxidation or about metabolic determinants of weight loss following this type of bariatric surgery.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the relationships between excess weight loss, resting metabolic rate (RMR) and substrate oxidation, and to identify metabolic predictive factors of weight loss after adjustable gastric banding.
SUBJECTS: Seventy-three obese nondiabetic women aged 39.1+/-10.4 years (18.4-64.8).
DESIGN: Resting metabolic rate and substrate oxidation (indirect calorimetry), body composition (bio-impedance), lipid profile and insulin sensitivity indexes were assessed before and after (13.3+/-6.0 months, range 6.0-31.1) adjustable gastric banding. Patients were classified according to postsurgery time: group A (6-12 months, n=39); group B (12-18 months, n=21); group C (>18 months, n=13). Metabolic parameters associated with the percentage of excess weight lost (EWL) 1 year after surgery were analyzed in univariate and multivariate regressions.
RESULTS: Mean weight loss was 26.2+/-11.4 kg. Mean fat mass loss was 17.3+/-8.1 kg. All biological parameters associated with excess weight improved after surgery. Excess weight lost at 1 year was 45.9+/-17.1% in group A, 47.4+/-17.1% in group B and 51.4+/-18.5% in group C (P=NS). Resting metabolic rate/fat-free mass (FFM) slightly decreased (28.9+/-3.26 vs 30.3+/-2.8, P<0.00001) and RMR/body weight slightly increased (18.5+/-2.8 vs 17.3+/-1.9, P<0.00001) after surgery. Respiratory quotient (0.81+/-0.06 vs 0.82+/-0.05) and FFM-adjusted lipid oxidation (1.10+/-0.41 vs 1.05+/-0.33 mg/min/kg FFM) were not significantly modified after surgery. In multiple linear regression analysis, difference in RMR/body weight, difference in energy sparing, baseline BMI and postsurgery time, were significantly and independently correlated with EWL (total R2=72.5%).
CONCLUSIONS: Adjustable gastric banding promotes gradual but sustained weight loss and is associated with long-term conservation of lipid oxidation and energy expenditure. The individual variability in energy sparing mechanisms predicts weight loss during the first year after surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16477271     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)        ISSN: 0307-0565            Impact factor:   5.095


  13 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms underlying weight loss after bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Alexander D Miras; Carel W le Roux
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 2.  Relative Energy Expenditure Decreases during the First Year after Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Fernando Lamarca; Mariana Silva Melendez-Araújo; Isabela Porto de Toledo; Eliane Said Dutra; Kênia Mara Baiocchi de Carvalho
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 3.  Changes in Resting Energy Expenditure in Relation to Body Weight and Composition Following Gastric Restriction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Matthew G Browning; Robert L Franco; John C Cyrus; Francesco Celi; Ronald K Evans
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Thermogenic changes after gastric bypass, adjustable gastric banding or diet alone.

Authors:  Charlotte Rabl; Madhu N Rao; Jean-Marc Schwarz; Kathleen Mulligan; Guilherme M Campos
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Sex differences in visceral adipose tissue post-bariatric surgery compared to matched non-surgical controls.

Authors:  J Korner; M Punyanitya; C Taveras; D J McMahon; H J Kim; W Inabnet; M Bessler; D Gallagher
Journal:  Int J Body Compos Res       Date:  2008

6.  Comparison of DXA and water measurements of body fat following gastric bypass surgery and a physiological model of body water, fat, and muscle composition.

Authors:  David G Levitt; Lauren M Beckman; Jennifer R Mager; Bret Valentine; Shalamar D Sibley; Tiffany R Beckman; Todd A Kellogg; Sayeed Ikramuddin; Carrie P Earthman
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2010-06-17

Review 7.  Surgical weight loss: impact on energy expenditure.

Authors:  David Thivel; Katrina Brakonieki; Pascale Duche; Béatrice Morio; Morio Béatrice; Yves Boirie; Boirie Yves; Blandine Laferrère
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Increase in ghrelin levels after weight loss in obese Zucker rats is prevented by gastric banding.

Authors:  Mariana P Monteiro; Andreia H Ribeiro; Ana F Nunes; Mónica M Sousa; J Duarte Monteiro; Artur P Aguas; M Helena Cardoso
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2007-11-30       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Long-Term Effect of Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy on Severe Obesity: Do Preoperative Weight Loss and Binge Eating Behavior Predict the Outcome of Bariatric Surgery?

Authors:  Tuula Pekkarinen; Harri Mustonen; Timo Sane; Nabil Jaser; Anne Juuti; Marja Leivonen
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  Evaluation of pre- and postoperative physical activity participation in laparoscopic gastric banding patients.

Authors:  Matthew G Browning; Nancy G Baugh; Luke G Wolfe; John K Kellum; James W Maher; Ronald K Evans
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.