BACKGROUND: Cardiac transplant recipients frequently have high plasma HDL levels but it is unclear whether these promote a cardioprotective profile. METHODS: Parameters of reverse cholesterol transport and endothelial function were compared in 25 cardiac transplant recipients with low (<1.4 mmol/L; n=11) or high (>1.4 mmol/L; n=14) plasma levels of HDL and in a reference healthy group. RESULTS: Patients with high HDL had lower levels of triglyceride and prebeta1-HDL and a higher proportion of large HDL particles. When normalized to apoA-I content, non-ABCA1-dependent cholesterol efflux from RAW 264.7 macrophage cells to plasma from high HDL patients was 33% lower when compared to plasma from patients with low HDL, whereas ABCA1-dependent cholesterol efflux was not impaired. Forearm vascular responses to acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside were not influenced by HDL levels in these patients. Compared to a reference healthy group (n=26), cardiac transplant recipients had higher levels of triglyceride, lower levels of prebeta1-HDL and LCAT, and lower activities of cholesteryl ester transfer protein and phospholipid transfer protein. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperalphalipoproteinaemia in cardiac transplant recipients is associated with the formation of partially dysfunctional HDL. We conclude that high levels of HDL may not confer cardioprotection in this group of patients.
BACKGROUND: Cardiac transplant recipients frequently have high plasma HDL levels but it is unclear whether these promote a cardioprotective profile. METHODS: Parameters of reverse cholesterol transport and endothelial function were compared in 25 cardiac transplant recipients with low (<1.4 mmol/L; n=11) or high (>1.4 mmol/L; n=14) plasma levels of HDL and in a reference healthy group. RESULTS:Patients with high HDL had lower levels of triglyceride and prebeta1-HDL and a higher proportion of large HDL particles. When normalized to apoA-I content, non-ABCA1-dependent cholesterol efflux from RAW 264.7 macrophage cells to plasma from high HDL patients was 33% lower when compared to plasma from patients with low HDL, whereas ABCA1-dependent cholesterol efflux was not impaired. Forearm vascular responses to acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside were not influenced by HDL levels in these patients. Compared to a reference healthy group (n=26), cardiac transplant recipients had higher levels of triglyceride, lower levels of prebeta1-HDL and LCAT, and lower activities of cholesteryl ester transfer protein and phospholipid transfer protein. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperalphalipoproteinaemia in cardiac transplant recipients is associated with the formation of partially dysfunctional HDL. We conclude that high levels of HDL may not confer cardioprotection in this group of patients.
Authors: Junichiro Tohyama; Jeffrey T Billheimer; Ilia V Fuki; George H Rothblat; Daniel J Rader; John S Millar Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2008-09-27 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Ali Javaheri; Maria Molina; Payman Zamani; Amrith Rodrigues; Eric Novak; Susan Chambers; Patricia Stutman; Wilhelmina Maslanek; Mary Williams; Scott M Lilly; Peter Heeger; Mohamed H Sayegh; Anil Chandraker; David M Briscoe; Kevin P Daly; Randall Starling; David Ikle; Jason Christie; J Eduardo Rame; Lee R Goldberg; Jeffrey Billheimer; Daniel J Rader Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2016-07-15 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: Hann Low; Lesley Cheng; Maria-Silvana Di Yacovo; Melissa J Churchill; Peter Meikle; Michael Bukrinsky; Andrew F Hill; Dmitri Sviridov Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2015-10-30 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Jincui Huang; Hyeyoung Lee; Angela M Zivkovic; Jennifer T Smilowitz; Nancy Rivera; J Bruce German; Carlito B Lebrilla Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2014-01-21 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Bevra H Hahn; Jennifer Grossman; Benjamin J Ansell; Brian J Skaggs; Maureen McMahon Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2008-08-29 Impact factor: 5.156
Authors: Michael Ditiatkovski; Wilissa D'Souza; Rajitha Kesani; Jaye Chin-Dusting; Judy B de Haan; Alan Remaley; Dmitri Sviridov Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-07-09 Impact factor: 3.240