Literature DB >> 16477091

Training the "less-affected" forelimb after unilateral cortical infarcts interferes with functional recovery of the impaired forelimb in rats.

R P Allred1, M A Maldonado, J E Hsu And, T A Jones.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Unilateral lesions of the sensorimotor cortex (SMC) in adult rats cause major behavioral changes in the ipsilesional, "less-affected" forelimb. An increase in function and reliance on this forelimb can aid compensation for contralesional impairments, but may also promote disuse and reduced functionality of the impaired forelimb. We hypothesized that training focused on the ipsilesional forelimb following a unilateral SMC lesion would reduce the efficacy of later motor rehabilitative training of the impaired forelimb.
METHODS: Rats with ischemic SMC lesions were trained on a skilled reaching task with the ipsilesional forelimb (PriorT) or received control procedures (Cont) for 10 days. Both groups were then trained with the impaired forelimb on the same reaching task for 10 days.
RESULTS: In comparison with Cont, PriorT rats had little improvement on the reaching task with the impaired forelimb and had a more enduring disuse of the impaired forelimb for postural support behaviors. Lesion sizes were similar between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Behavioral experience with the less-affected forelimb early after unilateral SMC lesions has the potential to increase disuse and dysfunction of the impaired forelimb, consistent with a training-induced exacerbation of learned non-use. These findings are suggestive of competitive processes in experience-dependent neural restructuring after brain damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16477091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci        ISSN: 0922-6028            Impact factor:   2.406


  40 in total

Review 1.  Motor Cortex and Motor Cortical Interhemispheric Communication in Walking After Stroke: The Roles of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Animal Models in Our Current and Future Understanding.

Authors:  Charalambos C Charalambous; Mark G Bowden; DeAnna L Adkins
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 2.  Priming the brain to capitalize on metaplasticity in stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Jessica M Cassidy; Bernadette T Gillick; James R Carey
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2013-08-15

3.  Abnormalities in skilled reaching movements are improved by peripheral anesthetization of the less-affected forelimb after sensorimotor cortical infarcts in rats.

Authors:  A O'Bryant; B Bernier; T A Jones
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2006-12-13       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Experience--a double edged sword for restorative neural plasticity after brain damage.

Authors:  Rachel P Allred; Theresa A Jones
Journal:  Future Neurol       Date:  2008-03-01

5.  Experience with the "good" limb induces aberrant synaptic plasticity in the perilesion cortex after stroke.

Authors:  Soo Young Kim; Rachel P Allred; DeAnna L Adkins; Kelly A Tennant; Nicole A Donlan; Jeffrey A Kleim; Theresa A Jones
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Experience-dependent neural plasticity in the adult damaged brain.

Authors:  Abigail L Kerr; Shao-Ying Cheng; Theresa A Jones
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 2.288

Review 7.  Motor compensation and its effects on neural reorganization after stroke.

Authors:  Theresa A Jones
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 8.  Motor System Reorganization After Stroke: Stimulating and Training Toward Perfection.

Authors:  Theresa A Jones; DeAnna L Adkins
Journal:  Physiology (Bethesda)       Date:  2015-09

9.  The effects of ceftriaxone on skill learning and motor functional outcome after ischemic cortical damage in rats.

Authors:  Soo Young Kim; Theresa A Jones
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 10.  Motor system plasticity in stroke models: intrinsically use-dependent, unreliably useful.

Authors:  Theresa A Jones; Rachel P Allred; Stephanie C Jefferson; Abigail L Kerr; Daniel A Woodie; Shao-Ying Cheng; DeAnna L Adkins
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 7.914

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.