OBJECTIVE: To assess the use of IV recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) in a statewide hospital-based stroke registry and to identify factors associated with its use among eligible patients. METHODS: A modified stratified sampling scheme was used to obtain a representative sample of 16 hospitals. Prospective case ascertainment and data collection were used to identify all acute stroke admissions over a 6-month period. Subjects eligible for IV rt-PA were defined as those who arrived within 3 hours of onset, who had no evidence of hemorrhage on initial brain image, and who had no physician-documented reasons for non-treatment with IV rt-PA. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with IV rt-PA use. RESULTS: Of 2,566 stroke admissions, 330 (12.9%) met the eligibility criteria for rt-PA treatment, and of these 43 (13%) received IV rt-PA treatment. Among 2,236 admissions excluded from consideration, 21% had evidence of hemorrhage on initial imaging, 35% had unknown stroke onset times, 38% had an onset to arrival time >3 hours, and 6% had physician documented contraindications. Among eligible patients, being male, use of emergency medical services, and rapid presentation were associated with increased IV rt-PA use. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with IV rt-PA was underutilized in this hospital-based stroke registry. The primary reason for nontreatment was delayed presentation. Reducing prehospital and in-hospital response times would help increase IV rt-PA use, as would greater emergency medical services use. Improving the documentation of onset times would help clarify the underlying causes of delayed presentation.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the use of IV recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) in a statewide hospital-based stroke registry and to identify factors associated with its use among eligible patients. METHODS: A modified stratified sampling scheme was used to obtain a representative sample of 16 hospitals. Prospective case ascertainment and data collection were used to identify all acute stroke admissions over a 6-month period. Subjects eligible for IV rt-PA were defined as those who arrived within 3 hours of onset, who had no evidence of hemorrhage on initial brain image, and who had no physician-documented reasons for non-treatment with IV rt-PA. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with IV rt-PA use. RESULTS: Of 2,566 stroke admissions, 330 (12.9%) met the eligibility criteria for rt-PA treatment, and of these 43 (13%) received IV rt-PA treatment. Among 2,236 admissions excluded from consideration, 21% had evidence of hemorrhage on initial imaging, 35% had unknown stroke onset times, 38% had an onset to arrival time >3 hours, and 6% had physician documented contraindications. Among eligible patients, being male, use of emergency medical services, and rapid presentation were associated with increased IV rt-PA use. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with IV rt-PA was underutilized in this hospital-based stroke registry. The primary reason for nontreatment was delayed presentation. Reducing prehospital and in-hospital response times would help increase IV rt-PA use, as would greater emergency medical services use. Improving the documentation of onset times would help clarify the underlying causes of delayed presentation.
Authors: William J Meurer; Deborah A Levine; Kevin A Kerber; Darin B Zahuranec; James Burke; Jonggyu Baek; Brisa Sánchez; Melinda A Smith; Lewis B Morgenstern; Lynda D Lisabeth Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2015-09-16 Impact factor: 5.721