Literature DB >> 16476792

Evaluation of six agglutination tests for Staphylococcus aureus identification depending upon local prevalence of meticillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA).

Klaus Weist1, Ann-Katrin Cimbal1, Christoph Lecke1, Günter Kampf2,1, Henning Rüden1, Ralf-Peter Vonberg3.   

Abstract

Most routine laboratory detection of Staphylococcus aureus isolates is based on rapid agglutination test systems. Failure of agglutination assays to identify meticillin-resistant S. aureus strains (MRSA) has been demonstrated. The aim of this study was to evaluate six commercially available agglutination tests for the detection of meticillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) and mecA-positive MRSA strains. The Dry Spot Staphytect Plus test (Oxoid), the Pastorex Staph Plus test (Bio-Rad), the Slidex Staph-Kit and Slidex Staph Plus test (bioMérieux), the Staphaurex Plus test (Remel) and the Staphylase Test (Oxoid) were used. As determined by pulsed field gel electrophoresis, 52 distinct MRSA strains from five countries, 83 MSSA strains and 150 coagulase-negative staphylococci were included. Species identification and determination of susceptibility patterns were performed using colony morphology, Gram stain, catalase testing, tube coagulase testing, DNase testing, mannitol fermentation, susceptibility testing towards oxacillin by Etest, coagulase gene PCR, fibrinogen receptor gene PCR and PCR of the mecA gene. Sensitivity of the agglutination tests ranged from 82.7 to 100.0 % for MRSA strains and 92.8 to 100.0 % for MSSA strains, respectively. Specificity of the test systems ranged from 91.3 to 99.1 %. None of the six agglutination assays produced correct reactions for all staphylococci tested. Only the Dry Spot Staphytect Plus test correctly identified all 52 MRSA strains. For the other tests kits, sensitivity of MRSA detection was lower than for MSSA isolates. Depending upon the local MRSA prevalence and the parameter of interest (sensitivity or specificity), these test systems may be useful for routine diagnostic purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16476792     DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.46225-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Microbiol        ISSN: 0022-2615            Impact factor:   2.472


  8 in total

1.  False-negative test results in the Slidex Staph Plus (bioMérieux) agglutination test are mainly caused by spa-type t001 and t001-related strains.

Authors:  F Szabados; J Woloszyn; M Kaase; S G Gatermann
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2010-10-09       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Systematic survey of nonspecific agglutination by Candida spp. in latex assays.

Authors:  Karsten Becker; Ahmed S Almasri; Christof von Eiff; Georg Peters; Christine Heilmann; Wolfgang Fegeler
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Quantitation of Staphylococcus aureus in seawater using CHROMagar SA.

Authors:  Alan D Tice; David Pombo; Jennifer Hui; Michelle Kurano; Matthew J Bankowski; Steven E Seifried
Journal:  Hawaii Med J       Date:  2010-01

4.  Bacteriophage-based latex agglutination test for rapid identification of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Evgeny A Idelevich; Thomas Walther; Sonja Molinaro; Xuehua Li; Guoqing Xia; Andreas Wieser; Georg Peters; Andreas Peschel; Karsten Becker
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Prevalence, risk factors, and molecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among newly arrested men in Baltimore, Maryland.

Authors:  Jason E Farley; Tracy Ross; Paul Stamper; Sharon Baucom; Elaine Larson; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 2.918

6.  Comparison of the BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) PCR assay to culture by use of BBL CHROMagar MRSA for detection of MRSA in nasal surveillance cultures from an at-risk community population.

Authors:  Jason E Farley; Paul D Stamper; Tracy Ross; Mian Cai; Sharon Speser; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  Emerging rapid resistance testing methods for clinical microbiology laboratories and their potential impact on patient management.

Authors:  Hagen Frickmann; Wycliffe Omurwa Masanta; Andreas E Zautner
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Rational Design of a User-Friendly Aptamer/Peptide-Based Device for the Detection of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Luca Ronda; Alessandro Tonelli; Elisa Sogne; Ida Autiero; Francesca Spyrakis; Sara Pellegrino; Giorgio Abbiati; Elisa Maffioli; Carsten Schulte; Riccardo Piano; Pietro Cozzini; Andrea Mozzarelli; Stefano Bettati; Francesca Clerici; Paolo Milani; Cristina Lenardi; Gabriella Tedeschi; Maria Luisa Gelmi
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 3.576

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.