Literature DB >> 16476605

Carotid artery stenting in octogenarians is associated with increased adverse outcomes.

Stephen F Stanziale1, Luke K Marone, Tamer N Boules, Judith A Brimmeier, Katherine Hill, Michel S Makaroun, Mark H Wholey.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Carotid artery stenting is an increasingly common endovascular treatment of carotid artery stenosis advocated in high-risk patients despite reports of increased adverse periprocedural outcomes in patients aged >80 years. We sought to evaluate our single institution experience with octogenarians and whether they have an increased incidence of major complications with carotid artery stenting.
METHODS: Three hundred eighty-six patients, including 260 patients from 10 regulatory trials, who underwent carotid artery stenting between June 1996 and March 2004 for symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid stenosis were reviewed from a prospectively maintained database. Periprocedural (< or =30 days after carotid artery stenting) cerebrovascular accident, transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, and death outcomes were compared between 87 octogenarians and 295 nonoctogenarians. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed for confounding factors. Kaplan-Meier analysis of stroke and death outcomes was performed for a 1-year follow-up.
RESULTS: All adverse outcomes were significantly higher in octogenarians compared with younger patients: 30-day stroke rate, 8.0% vs 2.7% (P = .02); 30-day stroke, myocardial infarction, or death, 9.2% vs 3.4% (P = .02). Cohorts were similar in terms of gender, comorbidities, antiplatelet medications, symptomatic status, and use of cerebral protection. Octogenarians had a greater incidence of contralateral internal carotid artery occlusion (26% vs 12%, P = .001), atrial fibrillation (21% vs 8%, P = .001), and congestive heart failure (28% vs 15%, P = .007), but a lower incidence of hypercholesterolemia (53% vs 72%, P = .001) and active smoking (8% vs 24%, P = .001). Multivariate analysis of 30-day major adverse outcomes demonstrated an association between age > or =80 and adverse outcome (odds ratio, 2.85; P = .043) as well as a protective effect of the preprocedural use of aspirin (odds ratio, 0.30, P = .027). At 1-year follow-up, only 75% of octogenarians and 87% of nonoctogenarians were free from stroke, myocardial infarction, or death (P = 005, Kaplan-Meier analysis).
CONCLUSIONS: Octogenarians undergoing carotid artery stenting are at higher risk than nonoctogenarians for periprocedural complications, including neurologic events and death. Major event-free survival at 1 year is also significantly better in nonoctogenarians. These risks should be weighed when considering carotid stenting in elderly patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16476605     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.10.062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  14 in total

1.  Effects of age and symptom status on silent ischemic lesions after carotid stenting with and without the use of distal filter devices.

Authors:  A Kastrup; K Gröschel; T Nägele; A Riecker; F Schmidt; S Schnaudigel; U Ernemann
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Age and outcomes after carotid stenting and endarterectomy: the carotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stenting trial.

Authors:  Jenifer H Voeks; George Howard; Gary S Roubin; Mahmoud B Malas; David J Cohen; W Charles Sternbergh; Herbert D Aronow; Mark K Eskandari; Alice J Sheffet; Brajesh K Lal; James F Meschia; Thomas G Brott
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Sex does not have an impact on perioperative transfemoral carotid artery stenting outcomes among octogenarians.

Authors:  Dania Mallick; Courtenay M Holscher; Joseph K Canner; Devin S Zarkowsky; Christopher J Abularrage; Caitlin W Hicks
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) Vascular Registry evaluation of comparative effectiveness of carotid revascularization procedures stratified by Medicare age.

Authors:  Jeffrey Jim; Brian G Rubin; Joseph J Ricotta; Christopher T Kenwood; Flora S Siami; Gregorio A Sicard
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 4.268

5.  Lesion-Related Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting with Closed-Cell Design without Embolic Protection Devices in High-Risk Elderly Patients-Can This Concept Work Out? A Single Center Experience Focusing on Stent Design.

Authors:  Silke Hopf-Jensen; Leonardo Marques; Michael Preiß; Stefan Müller-Hülsbeck
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2014-12

6.  Current concepts in the management of carotid stenosis.

Authors:  Norman R Hertzer
Journal:  F1000 Med Rep       Date:  2009-02-24

Review 7.  Carotid artery disease: stenting versus endarterectomy.

Authors:  Andreas Kastrup; Sonja Schnaudigel; Katrin Wasser; Klaus Gröschel
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.113

8.  An updated review of current concepts in the management of carotid stenosis.

Authors:  Norman R Hertzer
Journal:  F1000 Med Rep       Date:  2010-12-17

9.  Is age of 80 years a threshold for carotid revascularization?

Authors:  Boudewijn L Reichmann; Guus W van Lammeren; Frans L Moll; Gert J de Borst
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2011-02

10.  Age Does Not Affect Metoprolol's Effect on Perioperative Outcomes (From the POISE Database).

Authors:  Michael J Jacka; Gordon Guyatt; Richard Mizera; Janet Van Vlymen; Dario Ponce de Leon; Thomas Schricker; Mohd Yani Bahari; Bonan Lv; Lalitha Afzal; Maria Pilar Plou García; Xinmin Wu; Lília Nigro Maia; Maribel Arrieta; Purnima Rao-Melacini; Philip J Devereaux
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 5.108

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.