Literature DB >> 16476603

Defining the high-risk patient for carotid endarterectomy: an analysis of the prospective National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.

Michael C Stoner1, William M Abbott, Daniel R Wong, Hong T Hua, Glenn M Lamuraglia, Chirstopher J Kwolek, Michael T Watkins, Arvind K Agnihotri, William G Henderson, Shukri Khuri, Richard P Cambria.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is the gold standard for the treatment of carotid stenosis, but carotid angioplasty and stenting has been advocated in high-risk patients. The definition of such a population has been elusive, particularly because the data are largely retrospective. Our study examined results for CEA in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (both Veterans Affairs and private sector).
METHODS: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data were gathered prospectively for all patients undergoing primary isolated CEA during the interval 2000 to 2003 at 123 Veterans Affairs and 14 private sector academic medical centers. Study end points included the 30-day occurrence of any stroke, death, or cardiac event. A variety of clinical, demographic, and operative variables were assessed with multivariate models to identify risk factors associated with the composite (stroke, death, or cardiac event) end point. Adjudication of end points was by trained nurse reviewers (previously validated).
RESULTS: A total of 13,622 CEAs were performed during the study period; 95% were on male patients, and 91% of cases were conducted within the Veterans Affairs sector. The average age was 68.6 +/- 0.1 years, and 42.1% of the population had no prior neurologic event. The composite stroke, death, or cardiac event rate was 4.0%; the stroke/death rate was 3.4%. Multivariate correlates of the composite outcome were (odds ratio, P value) as follows: deciles of age (1.13, .018), insulin-requiring diabetes (1.73, <.001), oral agent-controlled diabetes (1.39, .003), decade of pack-years smoking (1.04, >.001), history of transient ischemic attack (1.41, >.001), history of stroke (1.51, >.001), creatinine >1.5 mg/dL (1.48, >.001), hypoalbuminemia (1.49, >.001), and fourth quartile of operative time (1.44, >.001). Cardiopulmonary comorbid features did not affect the composite outcome in this model. Regional anesthesia was used in 2437 (18%) cases, with a resultant relative risk reduction for stroke (17%), death (24%), cardiac event (33%), and the composite outcome (31%; odds ratio, 0.69; P = .008).
CONCLUSIONS: Carotid endarterectomy results across a spectrum of Veterans Affairs and private sector hospitals compare favorably to contemporary studies. These data will assist in selecting patients who are at an increased risk for adverse outcomes. Use of regional anesthetic significantly reduced perioperative complications in a risk-adjusted model, thus suggesting that it is the anesthetic of choice when CEA is performed in high-risk patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16476603     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.10.069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  19 in total

Review 1.  Carotid Disease Management: Surgery, Stenting, or Medication.

Authors:  Priyank Khandelwal; Seemant Chaturvedi
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Postendarterectomy mortality in octogenarians and nonagenarians in the USA from 1993 to 1999.

Authors:  Judith H Lichtman; Sara B Jones; Yun Wang; Emi Watanabe; Norrina B Allen; Pierre Fayad; Larry B Goldstein
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 2.762

3.  Toward hemodynamic diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis based on ultrasound image data and computational modeling.

Authors:  Luísa C Sousa; Catarina F Castro; Carlos C António; André Miguel F Santos; Rosa Maria Dos Santos; Pedro Miguel A C Castro; Elsa Azevedo; João Manuel R S Tavares
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 4.  Management of extracranial carotid artery disease.

Authors:  Yinn Cher Ooi; Nestor R Gonzalez
Journal:  Cardiol Clin       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.213

Review 5.  Temporal trends in safety of carotid endarterectomy in asymptomatic patients: systematic review.

Authors:  Alex B Munster; Angelo J Franchini; Mahim I Qureshi; Ankur Thapar; Alun H Davies
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  In-hospital versus postdischarge adverse events following carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Margriet Fokkema; Rodney P Bensley; Ruby C Lo; Allan D Hamden; Mark C Wyers; Frans L Moll; Gert Jan de Borst; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  Carotid endarterectomy benefits patients with CKD and symptomatic high-grade stenosis.

Authors:  Anna Mathew; Michael Eliasziw; P J Devereaux; Jose G Merino; Henry J M Barnett; Amit X Garg
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 10.121

8.  Characteristics that define high risk in carotid endarterectomy from the Vascular Study Group of New England.

Authors:  Lindsay Gates; Robert Botta; Felix Schlosser; Philip Goodney; Margriet Fokkema; Marc Schermerhorn; Timur Sarac; Jeffrey Indes
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  Risk factors for perioperative death and stroke after carotid endarterectomy: results of the new york carotid artery surgery study.

Authors:  Ethan A Halm; Stanley Tuhrim; Jason J Wang; Caron Rockman; Thomas S Riles; Mark R Chassin
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 10.  Management of carotid artery disease in the high-risk patient with emphasis on the SAPPHIRE study.

Authors:  Vivek Rajagopal; Jay S Yadav
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.