| Literature DB >> 16476560 |
Bodil Ström Holst1, Lena Englund, S Palacios, Lena Renström, Louise T Berndtsson.
Abstract
Serum samples from 214 Swedish cats with no signs of infectious disease were analysed for the presence of antibodies against Chlamydophila felis (Cp felis), while 209 of these were also analysed for feline coronavirus (FCoV) antibodies. The prevalence of antibodies against Cp felis was 11%, with no significant difference between purebred and mixed breed cats. The overall prevalence of antibodies against FCoV was 31%, significantly higher among pure breed cats (65%) than among mixed breed cats (17%). A high proportion of cats with antibodies against FCoV had relatively high antibody titres, and was therefore likely to be shedding FCoV in faeces. For Cp felis, the majority of seropositive animals had relatively low antibody titres, and the risk of these animals infecting others is not known.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2006 PMID: 16476560 PMCID: PMC7128862 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfms.2005.12.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Feline Med Surg ISSN: 1098-612X Impact factor: 2.015
Seroprevalence (%) of FCoV
| Parameter | 0 | 1 |
|---|---|---|
| 0 = mixed breed, 1 = purebred | 17 ( | 65 ( |
| 0 = age <1 year, 1 = age 1 year and older | 27 ( | 36 ( |
| 0 = group of <5, 1 = group of 5 or more | 29 ( | 71 ( |
| 0 = male, 1 = female | 28 ( | 35 ( |
| 0 = not neutered, 1 = neutered | 30 ( | 33 ( |
Indicates statistically significant difference within row. The total number of cats within each group is given within parentheses.
Fig 1Distribution of cats with antibodies against FCoV (n = 65).
Seroprevalence (%) of Chlamydophila felis
| Parameter | 0 | 1 |
|---|---|---|
| 0 = mixed breed, 1 = purebred | 9 ( | 18 ( |
| 0 = age <1 year, 1 = age 1 year and older | 9 ( | 14 ( |
| 0 = group of <5, 1 = group of 5 or more | 14 ( | 8 ( |
| 0 = male, 1 = female | 10 ( | 13 ( |
| 0 = not neutered, 1 = neutered | 11 ( | 11 ( |
| 0 = no history of conjunctivitis, 1 = history of conjunctivitis | 11 ( | 15 ( |
There are no significant differences within row. The total number of cats within each group is given within parentheses.
Fig 2Distribution of cats with antibodies against Chlamydophila felis (n = 24).
Fig 3Distribution of cats and the proportions seropositive to FCoV among different age groups.
Fig 4Distribution of cats and the proportions seropositive to Chlamydophila felis among different age groups.