Literature DB >> 16475678

DNA methylation of CHFR is not a predictor of the response to docetaxel and paclitaxel in advanced and recurrent gastric cancer.

Kazuhiro Yoshida1, Yoichi Hamai, Takahisa Suzuki, Yuichi Sanada, Naohide Oue, Wataru Yasui.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cell cycle checkpoint dysfunction is often associated with sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents. In this study, the question of whether DNA methylation of CHFR, a mitotic checkpoint gene, can predict the response of advanced and recurrent gastric cancers (GCs) to docetaxel or paclitaxel was examined.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a retrospective study, 41 patients with GC treated with paclitaxel alone (n=12) or a combination of docetaxel and S-1 (tegafur, 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine, potassium oxonate) (n=29) were studied. The DNA methylation status of the CHFR gene was examined by combined bisulfite restriction analysis of DNAs from 41 GC tissues and the methylation status was compared to their sensitivity to chemotherapy. The levels of CHFR mRNA were measured by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR.
RESULTS: DNA methylation of CHFR was found in 15 (36.6%) out of the 41 GC samples and the levels of CHFR mRNA were associated with the methylation status of CHFR (p = 0.034). In 41 samples of corresponding non-neoplastic mucosae, no DNA methylation of CHFR was detected. Among 12 patients treated with paclitaxel alone, only 1 (20.0%) of the 5 patients with CHFR methylation had a partial response (PR) to paclitaxel, whereas 3 (42.9%) of the 7 patients without CHFR methylation had a PR to paclitaxel (p = 0.836). In 29 patients treated with a combination of S-1 and docetaxel, there was no clear association between the CHFR methylation status and response to chemotherapy (p = 0.092).
CONCLUSION: We conclude that the DNA methylation of CHFR alone cannot predict the response of advanced and recurrent GC to docetaxel or paclitaxel. Both paclitaxel and docetaxel may be effective for treatment of GC even if CHFR is expressed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16475678

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Res        ISSN: 0250-7005            Impact factor:   2.480


  15 in total

Review 1.  Safeguarding entry into mitosis: the antephase checkpoint.

Authors:  Cheen Fei Chin; Foong May Yeong
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Association between CHFR methylation and chemosensitivity of paclitaxel in advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Mingming Wang; Lin Shen; Dajun Deng
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 3.  CHFR: a key checkpoint component implicated in a wide range of cancers.

Authors:  Sheru Sanbhnani; Foong May Yeong
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 9.261

4.  CHFR silencing or microsatellite instability is associated with increased antitumor activity of docetaxel or gemcitabine in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Lorraine Pelosof; Sashidhar R Yerram; Nita Ahuja; Andrew Delmas; Ludmila Danilova; James G Herman; Nilofer S Azad
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2013-08-24       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  CHFR: A Novel Mitotic Checkpoint Protein and Regulator of Tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Lisa M Privette; Elizabeth M Petty
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.243

6.  High-definition CpG methylation of novel genes in gastric carcinogenesis identified by next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Jorge L Sepulveda; Jorge L Gutierrez-Pajares; Aesis Luna; Yuan Yao; John W Tobias; Steven Thomas; Yanghee Woo; Federico Giorgi; Elena V Komissarova; Andrea Califano; Timothy C Wang; Antonia R Sepulveda
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 7.842

7.  Checkpoint with forkhead-associated and ring finger promoter hypermethylation correlates with microsatellite instability in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Eiji Oki; Yan Zhao; Rintaro Yoshida; Takanobu Masuda; Koji Ando; Masahiiko Sugiyama; Eriko Tokunaga; Masaru Morita; Yoshihiro Kakeji; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Clinical potential of DNA methylation in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nur Sabrina Sapari; Marie Loh; Aparna Vaithilingam; Richie Soong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The anti-proliferative effects of the CHFR depend on the forkhead associated domain, but not E3 ligase activity mediated by ring finger domain.

Authors:  Tomokazu Fukuda; Yasuyuki Kondo; Hitoshi Nakagama
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Emerging evidence for CHFR as a cancer biomarker: from tumor biology to precision medicine.

Authors:  Sarah Derks; Arjen H G Cleven; Veerle Melotte; Kim M Smits; Johann C Brandes; Nilofer Azad; Wim van Criekinge; Adriaan P de Bruïne; James G Herman; Manon van Engeland
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 9.264

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.