Literature DB >> 16475104

Seed banks, salmon, and sleeping genes: effective population size in semelparous, age-structured species with fluctuating abundance.

Robin S Waples1.   

Abstract

Previous studies reached contrasting conclusions regarding how fluctuations in abundance affect Ne in semelparous species with variable age at maturity: that Ne is determined by the arithmetic mean N among the T years within a generation (Ne approximately = T(N)t; monocarpic plants with seed banks) or the harmonic mean (Ne approximately T[symbol: see text]; Pacific salmon). I show that these conclusions arise from different model assumptions rather than inherent differences between the species. Sequentially applying standard, discrete-generation formulas for inbreeding Ne to a series of nominal generations accurately predicts the multigenerational rate of increase in inbreeding. Variability in mean realized reproductive success across years (kt) is the most important factor determining Ne and Ne/N. When abundance is driven by random variation in kt, Ne < or = T[symbol: see text] < T(N)t. With random variation in Nt and constant per capita seed production (C), variation in kt is low and Ne approximately T[symbol: see text]; however, if C varies among years, Ne can be closer to T[symbol: see text]. Because population regulation affects the genetic contribution of entire cohorts of monocarpic perennials, Ne for these species may be more closely approximated by T[symbol: see text] than by T(N)t. With density-dependent compensation, Cov(kt, Nt) < 0, and Ne is further reduced because relatively few breeders make a disproportionate contribution to the next generation.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16475104     DOI: 10.1086/498584

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  8 in total

1.  Temporal estimates of effective population size in species with overlapping generations.

Authors:  Robin S Waples; Masashi Yokota
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Simple life-history traits explain key effective population size ratios across diverse taxa.

Authors:  Robin S Waples; Gordon Luikart; James R Faulkner; David A Tallmon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The influence of persistent individual differences and age at maturity on effective population size.

Authors:  Aline Magdalena Lee; Steinar Engen; Bernt-Erik Sæther
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Temporal Genetic Dynamics of an Experimental, Biparental Field Population of Phytophthora capsici.

Authors:  Maryn O Carlson; Elodie Gazave; Michael A Gore; Christine D Smart
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 4.599

5.  Pacific salmon and the coalescent effective population size.

Authors:  Can Cenik; John Wakeley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effective number of breeders, effective population size and their relationship with census size in an iteroparous species, Salvelinus fontinalis.

Authors:  Daniel E Ruzzante; Gregory R McCracken; Samantha Parmelee; Kristen Hill; Amelia Corrigan; John MacMillan; Sandra J Walde
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Coevolution between native and invasive plant competitors: implications for invasive species management.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Leger; Erin K Espeland
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.183

8.  Effects of overlapping generations on linkage disequilibrium estimates of effective population size.

Authors:  Robin S Waples; Tiago Antao; Gordon Luikart
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 4.562

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.