Literature DB >> 16475027

MUC1, MUC2, MUC4, MUC5AC and MUC6 expression in the progression of prostate cancer.

Paul J Cozzi1, Jian Wang, Warick Delprado, Alan C Perkins, Barry J Allen, Pamela J Russell, Yong Li.   

Abstract

Molecular changes are vital for the development of prognostic markers and therapeutic modalities of prostate cancer (CaP). There is growing interest in mucins as treatment targets in human malignancies, including CaP. The role of their expression in the progression of CaP is however unclear. We examined the expressions MUC1, MUC2, MUC4, MUC5AC and MUC6 in CaP tissues using tissue microarrays (TMAs) to look for tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) for targeted therapy. In this study, 120 paraffin-embedded specimens were selected from patients who underwent radical retro-pubic prostatectomy (RRP) or trans-urethral-resection of the prostate (TURP) for primary, untreated CaP and 10 matched lymph node metastases. A series of MUC monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) was used on TMAs by standard immunohistochemistry. Our results indicate that the over-expression of MUC1 was detected in 58% of primary CaP tissues and 90% of lymph node metastases but not in normal prostate or benign tissues, while the expression of MUC2, MUC4, MUC5AC and MUC6 was found to be negative in both normal and cancer tissues. Of the MUC1 positive tumors 86% were Gleason grade 7 or higher. Over-expression of MUC1 was found in late stage CaP while MUC2, 4, 5AC and 6 were negative in CaP. MUC1 is a TAA that is highly related to tumor progression in CaP patients. This antigen is ideal for targeted therapy to control micrometastases and hormone refractory disease but additional studies are necessary to assess its usefulness in patient biopsies and CaP bone metastases before clinical trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16475027     DOI: 10.1007/s10585-005-5376-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis        ISSN: 0262-0898            Impact factor:   4.510


  52 in total

Review 1.  The TNM classification of prostate cancer.

Authors:  F H Schröder; P Hermanek; L Denis; W R Fair; M K Gospodarowicz; M Pavone-Macaluso
Journal:  Prostate Suppl       Date:  1992

Review 2.  Technology evaluation: TG-1031, Transgene SA.

Authors:  C Doehn; D Jocham
Journal:  Curr Opin Mol Ther       Date:  2000-02

3.  Expression of MUC1, MUC2, MUC3 and MUC4 mucin mRNAs in human pancreatic and intestinal tumor cell lines.

Authors:  M A Hollingsworth; J M Strawhecker; T C Caffrey; D R Mack
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1994-04-15       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  C R Pound; A W Partin; M A Eisenberger; D W Chan; J D Pearson; P C Walsh
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-05-05       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  New aspects of siglec binding specificities, including the significance of fucosylation and of the sialyl-Tn epitope. Sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin superfamily lectins.

Authors:  E C Brinkman-Van der Linden; A Varki
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-03-24       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  In vitro and preclinical targeted alpha therapy of human prostate cancer with Bi-213 labeled J591 antibody against the prostate specific membrane antigen.

Authors:  Y Li; Z Tian; S M A Rizvi; N H Bander; B J Allen
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.554

7.  A highly immunogenic region of a human polymorphic epithelial mucin expressed by carcinomas is made up of tandem repeats.

Authors:  S Gendler; J Taylor-Papadimitriou; T Duhig; J Rothbard; J Burchell
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1988-09-15       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Association of the DF3/MUC1 breast cancer antigen with Grb2 and the Sos/Ras exchange protein.

Authors:  P Pandey; S Kharbanda; D Kufe
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1995-09-15       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  MUC6 is a marker of seminal vesicle-ejaculatory duct epithelium and is useful for the differential diagnosis with prostate adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Xavier Leroy; Charles Ballereau; Arnauld Villers; Fabien Saint; Sebastien Aubert; Bernard Gosselin; Nicole Porchet; Marie-Christine Copin
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.394

10.  MUC1 expression in primary and metastatic pancreatic cancer cells for in vitro treatment by (213)Bi-C595 radioimmunoconjugate.

Authors:  C F Qu; Y Li; Y J Song; S M A Rizvi; C Raja; D Zhang; J Samra; R Smith; A C Perkins; C Apostolidis; B J Allen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-12-13       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  44 in total

1.  Molecular Validation of PACE4 as a Target in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  François D'Anjou; Sophie Routhier; Jean-Pierre Perreault; Alain Latil; David Bonnel; Isabelle Fournier; Michel Salzet; Robert Day
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 4.243

2.  MUC1 is upregulated in advanced prostate cancer and is an independent prognostic factor.

Authors:  V Genitsch; I Zlobec; G N Thalmann; A Fleischmann
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 5.554

3.  Untouchable genes in the human genome: Identifying ideal targets for cancer treatment.

Authors:  Ivan P Gorlov; Olga Y Gorlova; Christopher I Amos
Journal:  Cancer Genet       Date:  2019-01-24

4.  MUC1 oncoprotein is a druggable target in human prostate cancer cells.

Authors:  Maya Datt Joshi; Rehan Ahmad; Li Yin; Deepak Raina; Hasan Rajabi; Glenn Bubley; Surender Kharbanda; Donald Kufe
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 5.  Differentiating rectal carcinoma by an immunohistological analysis of carcinomas of pelvic organs based on the NCBI Literature Survey and the Human Protein Atlas database.

Authors:  Koh Miura; Kazuyuki Ishida; Wataru Fujibuchi; Akihiro Ito; Hitoshi Niikura; Hitoshi Ogawa; Iwao Sasaki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  MUC6 down-regulation correlates with gastric carcinoma progression and a poor prognosis: an immunohistochemical study with tissue microarrays.

Authors:  Huachuan Zheng; Hiroyuki Takahashi; Takahiko Nakajima; Yoshihiro Murai; Zhengguo Cui; Kazuhiro Nomoto; Koichi Tsuneyama; Yasuo Takano
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-06-29       Impact factor: 4.553

7.  Glycosylation potential of human prostate cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Yin Gao; Vishwanath B Chachadi; Pi-Wan Cheng; Inka Brockhausen
Journal:  Glycoconj J       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 2.916

8.  Expression of matrix metalloproteinase 2 and extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer are unfavorable postoperative prognostic factors in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Che Zhang; Ziliang Tu; Shiming Du; Yong Wang; Qibin Wang
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2009-07-25       Impact factor: 3.201

9.  CD147 expression indicates unfavourable prognosis in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Zhao-dong Han; Xue-cheng Bi; Wei-jun Qin; Hui-chan He; Qi-shan Dai; Jun Zou; Yong-kang Ye; Yu-xiang Liang; Guo-hua Zeng; Zhi-nan Chen; Wei-de Zhong
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.201

10.  Prostate cancer genes associated with TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusion and prognostic of biochemical recurrence in multiple cohorts.

Authors:  B G Barwick; M Abramovitz; M Kodani; C S Moreno; R Nam; W Tang; M Bouzyk; A Seth; B Leyland-Jones
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.