Literature DB >> 16474168

Stage matters: choosing relevant model systems to address hypotheses in diet and cancer chemoprevention research.

Jenifer I Fenton1, Norman G Hord.   

Abstract

Clinical evidence reveals that the efficacy of dietary factors to prevent cancer is probably stage-dependent. The ability to demonstrate stage-specific effects of dietary compounds on normal, preneoplastic and malignant cell models may provide insights into puzzling clinical results from cancer chemoprevention trials. The relevance of these models to the field of cancer prevention is immense and will undoubtedly facilitate the ability to discover which dietary factors are most effective at preventing cancer and which, if any, specific steps in neoplastic transformation render cells refractory to the effects of dietary compounds. There are illustrative examples where exposure of high-risk individuals to dietary chemopreventive agents increases rather than decreases cancer risk. While geneticists and clinical oncologists acknowledge the morphological continuum along which tumors develop in specific tissues, tumor cells, rather than normal and preneoplastic cells, continue to be the primary in vitro reductionist tool employed to elucidate mechanisms underlying disease progression and to investigate the potential utility of dietary as well as other chemopreventive agents. Currently, there are few relevant model systems to study the progression of neoplastic transformation, especially in epithelial cells. We highlight examples of model systems isolated from prostate, breast, endometrial and intestinal tissue, with special emphasis on a specific set of non-tumorigenic, conditionally immortal cell lines derived from C57/BL6 mice [YAMC (Young Adult Mouse Colon cells; Apc+/+) cells and IMCE (Immorto-Min Colonic Epithelium cells; ApcMin/+) cells] that have yielded important information on early events in colorectal neoplasia development. These cell lines are an illustrative example of how researchers can examine stage-dependent effects of specific dietary components on carcinogenesis. The utilization of cell culture systems modeling early, middle and late stages of tumorigenesis will yield important insights into mechanisms by which dietary components impact cancer progression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16474168     DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgi355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Carcinogenesis        ISSN: 0143-3334            Impact factor:   4.944


  13 in total

1.  Phytochemical induction of cell cycle arrest by glutathione oxidation and reversal by N-acetylcysteine in human colon carcinoma cells.

Authors:  R Y Odom; M Y Dansby; A M Rollins-Hairston; K M Jackson; W G Kirlin
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.900

2.  Combinatorial cytotoxic effects of Curcuma longa and Zingiber officinale on the PC-3M prostate cancer cell line.

Authors:  Kesava Rao V Kurapati; Thangavel Samikkannu; Dakshayani B Kadiyala; Saiyed M Zainulabedin; Nimisha Gandhi; Sadhana S Sathaye; Manohar A Indap; Nawal Boukli; Jose W Rodriguez; Madhavan P N Nair
Journal:  J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  2012

3.  Effect of low or high glycemic load diets on experimentally induced mammary carcinogenesis in rats.

Authors:  Henry J Thompson; Marian L Neuhouser; Johanna W Lampe; John N McGinley; Elizabeth S Neil; Yvonne Schwartz; Anne McTiernan
Journal:  Mol Nutr Food Res       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 5.914

4.  Novel mechanism for obesity-induced colon cancer progression.

Authors:  Janette M Birmingham; Julia V Busik; Fay M Hansen-Smith; Jenifer I Fenton
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 5.  Establishment of conditionally immortalized epithelial cell lines from the intestinal tissue of adult normal and transgenic mice.

Authors:  Robert H Whitehead; Pamela S Robinson
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 4.052

6.  Assessment of the effects of severe obesity and lifestyle risk factors on stage of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Marisa A Bittoni; James L Fisher; Jeffrey M Fowler; George L Maxwell; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 7.  Obesity and colorectal cancer: role of adipokines in tumor initiation and progression.

Authors:  Silvia Riondino; Mario Roselli; Raffaele Palmirotta; David Della-Morte; Patrizia Ferroni; Fiorella Guadagni
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Bio-imaging of colorectal cancer models using near infrared labeled epidermal growth factor.

Authors:  Gadi Cohen; Shimon Lecht; Hadar Arien-Zakay; Keren Ettinger; Orit Amsalem; Mor Oron-Herman; Eylon Yavin; Diana Prus; Simon Benita; Aviram Nissan; Philip Lazarovici
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Standing genetic variation in contingency loci drives the rapid adaptation of Campylobacter jejuni to a novel host.

Authors:  John P Jerome; Julia A Bell; Anne E Plovanich-Jones; Jeffrey E Barrick; C Titus Brown; Linda S Mansfield
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Combined genotoxic effects of a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (B(a)P) and an heterocyclic amine (PhIP) in relation to colorectal carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Emilien L Jamin; Anne Riu; Thierry Douki; Laurent Debrauwer; Jean-Pierre Cravedi; Daniel Zalko; Marc Audebert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.