RATIONALE: Treatment of latent tuberculosis (TB) infection with weekly rifapentine and isoniazid is a potentially effective alternative to current therapies. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of weekly rifapentine/isoniazid to daily rifampin/pyrazinamide in preventing TB in household contacts of patients with pulmonary TB in Brazil. METHODS: Contacts of patients with TB were randomized to rifapentine 900 mg/isoniazid 900 mg once weekly for 12 wk or rifampin 450-600 mg/pyrazinamide 750-1,500 mg daily for 8 wk and followed for at least 2 yr. MEASUREMENTS: TB rates, adverse events, and adherence to therapy. MAIN RESULTS:A total of 399 household contacts were enrolled, 206 in the rifapentine/isoniazid arm and 193 in the rifampin/pyrazinamide arm. The median age was 34 yr, median weight was 63 kg, 60% of participants were female, and only one patient was HIV infected. Rifapentine/isoniazid was well tolerated, but the trial was halted by the investigators before completion because of unanticipated hepatotoxicity in the rifampin/pyrazinamide arm. Twenty of 193 participants (10%) receivingrifampin/pyrazinamide experienced grade 3 or 4 hepatotoxicity, compared with 2 of 206 participants (1%) on rifapentine/isoniazid (p<0.001). There were no hospitalizations or deaths due to hepatotoxicity, and all participants' liver enzyme levels returned to normal during follow-up. During follow-up, four cases of active TB developed, three in the rifapentine/isoniazid group and one in the rifampin/pyrazinamide group (1.46 vs. 0.52%; difference, 0.94%; 95% confidence interval, -1.6 to 3.7%). CONCLUSIONS:Rifapentine/isoniazid was better tolerated than rifampin/pyrazinamide and was associated with good protection against TB. Rifapentine/isoniazid weekly for 12 wk is likely a promising therapy for latent TB infection.
RCT Entities:
RATIONALE: Treatment of latent tuberculosis (TB) infection with weekly rifapentine and isoniazid is a potentially effective alternative to current therapies. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of weekly rifapentine/isoniazid to daily rifampin/pyrazinamide in preventing TB in household contacts of patients with pulmonary TB in Brazil. METHODS: Contacts of patients with TB were randomized to rifapentine 900 mg/isoniazid 900 mg once weekly for 12 wk or rifampin 450-600 mg/pyrazinamide 750-1,500 mg daily for 8 wk and followed for at least 2 yr. MEASUREMENTS: TB rates, adverse events, and adherence to therapy. MAIN RESULTS: A total of 399 household contacts were enrolled, 206 in the rifapentine/isoniazid arm and 193 in the rifampin/pyrazinamide arm. The median age was 34 yr, median weight was 63 kg, 60% of participants were female, and only one patient was HIV infected. Rifapentine/isoniazid was well tolerated, but the trial was halted by the investigators before completion because of unanticipated hepatotoxicity in the rifampin/pyrazinamide arm. Twenty of 193 participants (10%) receiving rifampin/pyrazinamide experienced grade 3 or 4 hepatotoxicity, compared with 2 of 206 participants (1%) on rifapentine/isoniazid (p<0.001). There were no hospitalizations or deaths due to hepatotoxicity, and all participants' liver enzyme levels returned to normal during follow-up. During follow-up, four cases of active TB developed, three in the rifapentine/isoniazid group and one in the rifampin/pyrazinamide group (1.46 vs. 0.52%; difference, 0.94%; 95% confidence interval, -1.6 to 3.7%). CONCLUSIONS:Rifapentine/isoniazid was better tolerated than rifampin/pyrazinamide and was associated with good protection against TB. Rifapentine/isoniazid weekly for 12 wk is likely a promising therapy for latent TB infection.
Authors: Robert M Jasmer; Jussi J Saukkonen; Henry M Blumberg; Charles L Daley; John Bernardo; Eric Vittinghoff; Mark D King; L Masae Kawamura; Philip C Hopewell Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2002-10-15 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: N A Halsey; J S Coberly; J Desormeaux; P Losikoff; J Atkinson; L H Moulton; M Contave; M Johnson; H Davis; L Geiter; E Johnson; R Huebner; R Boulos; R E Chaisson Journal: Lancet Date: 1998-03-14 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: C M Tam; S L Chan; C W Lam; C C Leung; K M Kam; J S Morris; D A Mitchison Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 1998-06 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: L Chapuis; B Ji; C Truffot-Pernot; R J O'Brien; M C Raviglione; J H Grosset Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 1994-11 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Jossy van den Boogaard; Gibson S Kibiki; Elton R Kisanga; Martin J Boeree; Rob E Aarnoutse Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2008-12-15 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: D Shepardson; S M Marks; H Chesson; A Kerrigan; D P Holland; N Scott; X Tian; A S Borisov; N Shang; C M Heilig; T R Sterling; M E Villarino; W R Mac Kenzie Journal: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 2.373
Authors: Neil A Martinson; Grace L Barnes; Lawrence H Moulton; Reginah Msandiwa; Harry Hausler; Malathi Ram; James A McIntyre; Glenda E Gray; Richard E Chaisson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-07-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: George K Siberry; Mark J Abzug; Sharon Nachman; Michael T Brady; Kenneth L Dominguez; Edward Handelsman; Lynne M Mofenson; Steve Nesheim Journal: Pediatr Infect Dis J Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 2.129
Authors: Timothy R Sterling; Ruth N Moro; Andrey S Borisov; Elizabeth Phillips; Gillian Shepherd; Newton Franklin Adkinson; Stephen Weis; Christine Ho; Margarita Elsa Villarino Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2015-04-22 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Tianyu Zhang; Si-Yang Li; Kathy N Williams; Koen Andries; Eric L Nuermberger Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2011-06-09 Impact factor: 21.405