Literature DB >> 16473888

Physical and chemical interactions between aphids and plants.

Torsten Will1, Aart J E van Bel.   

Abstract

Aphids feed from sieve tubes deep inside the host plant. Therefore, aphids must be able to recognize their host plant(s) and to direct their stylets which must be long and thin enough to reach and puncture the sieve tubes at a particular site. Sieve tubes in angiosperms are longitudinal arrays of sieve element/companion cell modules which are highly sensitive to disturbance of any kind. The sieve tubes dispose of elaborate sealing mechanisms such as protein plugging and callose sealing which are triggered by a rise in calcium in the sieve tubes. Aphids seem to have developed a range of physical and chemical measures to limit the amount of calcium influx in response to stylet puncturing. Loss of sieve-element turgor pressure induced by stylet insertion is minimized by the minute stylet volume. Turgor-dependent Ca(2+) influx, possibly mediated by mechano sensitive Ca(2+) channels, must therefore be limited. The components of the sheath and watery saliva play a pivotal role in establishing the physical and chemical constraints on the rise of calcium. Most likely, sheath saliva prevents the influx of calcium from the apoplast by sealing the stylet puncture site while watery saliva may prevent plugging and sealing of sieve plates by potential interaction with SE sap ingredients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16473888     DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erj089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Bot        ISSN: 0022-0957            Impact factor:   6.992


  74 in total

1.  Arabidopsis thaliana-Aphid Interaction.

Authors:  Joe Louis; Vijay Singh; Jyoti Shah
Journal:  Arabidopsis Book       Date:  2012-05-22

2.  Hitching a ride: Vector feeding and virus transmission.

Authors:  Candice A Stafford; Gregory P Walker; Diane E Ullman
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2012-01-01

Review 3.  Macromolecules in phloem exudates--a review.

Authors:  Craig A Atkins; Penny M C Smith; Caren Rodriguez-Medina
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 3.356

4.  Molecular sabotage of plant defense by aphid saliva.

Authors:  Torsten Will; W Fred Tjallingii; Alexandra Thönnessen; Aart J E van Bel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Translocation in legumes: assimilates, nutrients, and signaling molecules.

Authors:  Craig Anthony Atkins; Penelope Mary Collina Smith
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 6.  Avoiding effective defenses: strategies employed by phloem-feeding insects.

Authors:  Linda L Walling
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Sex differences in piercing-sucking sites on leaves of Ligustrum lucidum (Oleaceae) infested by the Chinese white wax scale insect, Ericerus pela (Chavannes) (Hemiptera: Coccidae).

Authors:  J J Zhao; Z L Wang; X M Chen; Y Chen
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 1.434

8.  Enhanced aphid detoxification when confronted by a host with elevated ROS production.

Authors:  Jiaxin Lei; Keyan Zhu-Salzman
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2015

9.  Plant- and stimulus-specific variations in remote-controlled sieve-tube occlusion.

Authors:  Alexandra Cu Furch; Jens B Hafke; Aart Je van Bel
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2008-10

10.  rgs-CaM Detects and Counteracts Viral RNA Silencing Suppressors in Plant Immune Priming.

Authors:  Eun Jin Jeon; Kazuki Tadamura; Taiki Murakami; Jun-Ichi Inaba; Bo Min Kim; Masako Sato; Go Atsumi; Kazuyuki Kuchitsu; Chikara Masuta; Kenji S Nakahara
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 5.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.