Literature DB >> 16473458

Penile suspensory ligament division for penile augmentation: indications and results.

Chi-Ying Li1, Oliver Kayes, Phillip D Kell, Nim Christopher, Suks Minhas, David J Ralph.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the management of patients requesting penile length enhancement by division of the penile suspensory ligament.
METHODS: From September 1998 to January 2005, 42 patients with a variety of etiologies were included; all underwent division of the penile suspensory ligament. The outcome was assessed objectively based on increase in flaccid stretched penile length (SPL) and subjectively using the rates of patient satisfaction.
RESULTS: The mean increase in SPL was 1.3+/-0.9 cm (range, -1 to +3 cm), with the addition of a silicone spacer placed between the pubis and penis giving a better outcome (p<0.05). The overall patient satisfaction rate was 35% but lower in the group with penile dysmorphic disorder at 27%.
CONCLUSION: Division of the penile suspensory ligament or other augmentation techniques may increase penile length but usually not to a degree that satisfies the patient. Men with penile dysmorphic disorder often have unrealistic expectations regarding the outcome of surgical intervention and should be encouraged to seek psychological help primarily, with surgery reserved as the last resort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16473458     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.01.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  21 in total

1.  Phalloplasty and penile implant surgery.

Authors:  Jorge R Caso; Michael D Myers; Lucas Wiegand; Alejandro Rodriguez; Shan Hann; Rafael Carrion
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Penile enhancement with rectus muscle fascia and testicular tunica vaginalis grafts: an experimental animal study.

Authors:  Sahin Bagbanci; Mumtaz Dadali; Levent Emir; Yasin Aydogmus; Elif Ozer
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 3.  The inconspicuous penis in children.

Authors:  Marcello Cimador; Pieralba Catalano; Rita Ortolano; Mario Giuffrè
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Is V-Y plasty necessary for penile lengthening? Girth enhancement and increased length solely through circumcision: description of a novel technique.

Authors:  Nikos Mertziotis; Diomidis Kozyrakis; Elias Bogris
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 5.  Therapeutic strategies for patients with micropenis or penile dysmorphic disorder.

Authors:  Oliver Kayes; Majid Shabbir; David Ralph; Suks Minhas
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  Dorsal Phalloplasty to Preserve Penis Length after Penile Prosthesis Implantation.

Authors:  Osama Shaeer; Kamal Shaeer; Islam A Rahman
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2017-03-30

Review 7.  History and future perspectives of male aesthetic genital surgery.

Authors:  Claudia Zaccaro; David Subirà; Iñigo López-Diez; Celeste Manfredi; Julmar Paul Ascensios-Vargas; Ignacio Moncada-Iribarren
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 8.  Review of penile reconstructive techniques.

Authors:  Sverrir Kristinsson; Mark Johnson; David Ralph
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 2.896

9.  Penile enhancement procedures with simultaneous penile prosthesis placement.

Authors:  Tariq S Hakky; Jessica Suber; Gerard Henry; David Smith; Paul Bradley; Daniel Martinez; Rafael E Carrion
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2012-06-28

10.  Suprapubic Liposuction With a Modified Devine's Technique for Buried Penis Release in Adults.

Authors:  Peiyang Zhang; Baicheng Wang; Xiaowei Zhang; Ziqi Song; Wenjun Bai; Qing Li; Tao Xu
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 0.947

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.