Literature DB >> 16473444

Biomonitoring: is body burden relevant to public health?

Dennis Paustenbach1, David Galbraith.   

Abstract

Biomonitoring is the study of the presence and concentration of chemicals in humans usually by the measurement of blood, urine or breath (exhaled air). Properly conducted, these data provide a picture of the amount of a chemical or agent actually absorbed into the body for a specific period of time. This review provides a history of biomonitoring, as well as the limitations and potential benefits of these studies. Examples of the proper and possibly improper use of biomonitoring and the impact made on our society are provided. Reasons for having comprehensive national biomonitoring programs are summarized, along with the societal benefits and risks. A brief discussion of the history of the NHANES program and select results from the 2005 Report are presented. By 2010, it has been predicted that the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) will be monitoring nearly 1000 chemicals in persons from all regions of the nation. The measurement of chemicals and biomarkers has revolutionized the field of exposure assessment. Overall, we recommend an approach of careful interpretation, understanding that the data obtained are useful for establishing baseline information about exposure, rather than equating detection with risk. We present suggestions for contextualizing biomonitoring results in order to provide the public with the tools to distinguish genuine health risks from trivial ones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16473444     DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2006.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  10 in total

1.  Litigating Toxic Risks Ahead of Regulation: Biomonitoring Science in the Courtroom.

Authors:  Laura Hall; Alastair Iles; Rachel Morello-Frosch
Journal:  Stanf Environ Law J       Date:  2012-03

2.  Withdrawn: The production of corporate research to manufacture doubt about the health hazards of products: an overview of the Exponent Bakelite™ simulation study.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health       Date:  2016-04-29

3.  Detoxification in naturopathic medicine: a survey.

Authors:  Jason Allen; Melissa Montalto; Jennifer Lovejoy; Wendy Weber
Journal:  J Altern Complement Med       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 2.579

4.  A Collaborative Approach to Assess Legacy Pollution in Communities Near a Lead-Acid Battery Smelter: The "Truth Fairy" Project.

Authors:  Jill E Johnston; Mark Lopez; Matthew O Gribble; Wendy Gutschow; Christine Austin; Manish Arora
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2019-10

5.  BIOAMBIENT.ES study protocol: rationale and design of a cross-sectional human biomonitoring survey in Spain.

Authors:  Beatriz Pérez-Gómez; Roberto Pastor-Barriuso; Marta Cervantes-Amat; Marta Esteban; Montserrat Ruiz-Moraga; Nuria Aragonés; Marina Pollán; Carmen Navarro; Eva Calvo; Javier Román; Gonzalo López-Abente; Argelia Castaño
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Environmental chemicals: evaluating low-dose effects.

Authors:  Linda S Birnbaum
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Perspectives on Biological Monitoring in Environmental Health Research: A Focus Group Study in a Native American Community.

Authors:  Melissa Gonzales; Elanda King; Jeanette Bobelu; Donica M Ghahate; Teresa Madrid; Sheri Lesansee; Vallabh Shah
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 8.  Toxic ignorance and right-to-know in biomonitoring results communication: a survey of scientists and study participants.

Authors:  Rachel Morello-Frosch; Julia Green Brody; Phil Brown; Rebecca Gasior Altman; Ruthann A Rudel; Carla Pérez
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2009-02-28       Impact factor: 5.984

Review 9.  Applicability of non-invasively collected matrices for human biomonitoring.

Authors:  Roel Smolders; Karl-Werner Schramm; Marc Nickmilder; Greet Schoeters
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 5.984

10.  Profile of Environmental Chemicals in the Korean Population-Results of the Korean National Environmental Health Survey (KoNEHS) Cycle 3, 2015-2017.

Authors:  Sun Kyoung Jung; Wookhee Choi; Sung Yeon Kim; Sooyeon Hong; Hye Li Jeon; Youngkyung Joo; Chulwoo Lee; Kyungho Choi; Sungkyoon Kim; Kee-Jae Lee; Jiyoung Yoo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.