Literature DB >> 16473355

Common errors in the design of orthopaedic studies.

Christopher M Bono1, Paul Tornetta.   

Abstract

There are several issues that one has to take into consideration in order to avoid potential pitfalls in the design of orthopaedic studies. This article highlights how to avoid common errors and how to continue the drive towards the unattainable, but laudable, goal of perfection.

Mesh：

Year:  2006        PMID： 16473355     DOI： 10.1016/j.injury.2006.01.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN： 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  2 in total

1.  Are large fracture trials really possible? What we have learned from the randomized controlled damage control study?

Authors:  Eva Steinhausen; Bertil Bouillon; Dieter Rixen
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  Impact of the method of initial stabilization for femoral shaft fractures in patients with multiple injuries at risk for complications (borderline patients).

Authors:  Hans-Christoph Pape; Dieter Rixen; John Morley; Elisabeth Ellingsen Husebye; Michael Mueller; Clemens Dumont; Andreas Gruner; Hans Joerg Oestern; Michael Bayeff-Filoff; Christina Garving; Dustin Pardini; Martijn van Griensven; Christian Krettek; Peter Giannoudis
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 12.969
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.