Literature DB >> 16473089

The evaluation of microleakage and bond strength of a silicone-based resilient liner following denture base surface pretreatment.

Duygu Sarac1, Y Sinasi Sarac, Tarik Basoglu, Oktay Yapici, Emir Yuzbasioglu.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The failure of adhesion between a silicone-based resilient liner and a denture base is a significant clinical problem.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of denture base resin surface pretreatments with different chemical etchants preceding the silicone-based resilient liner application on microleakage and bond strength. The initial effects of chemical etchants on the denture base resin in terms of microstructural changes and flexural strength were also examined.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-two polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) denture base resin (Meliodent) specimens consisting of 2 plates measuring 30 x 30 x 2 mm were prepared and divided into 7 groups (n = 6). Specimen groups were treated by immersion in acetone for 30 (A30) or 45 (A45) seconds, methyl methacrylate monomer for 180 (M180) seconds, and methylene chloride for 5 (MC5), 15 (MC15) or 30 (MC30) seconds. Group C had no surface treatment and served as the control. Subsequently, an adhesive (Mollosil) and a silicone-based resilient denture liner (Mollosil) were applied to the treated surfaces, and all specimens were immersed in the radiotracer solution (thalium-201 chloride) for 24 hours. Tracer activity (x-ray counts), as a parameter of microleakage, was measured using a gamma camera. For bond-strength measurement, 84 rectangular PMMA specimens (10 x 10 x 40 mm) were surface-smoothed for bonding and treated with the different chemical etchants using the same previously described group configurations. The adhesive and the silicone-based denture liner were applied to the treated surfaces. Tensile bond-strength (MPa) was measured in a universal testing machine. Flexural strength measurement was performed with 49 PMMA specimens (65 x 10 x 3.3 mm according to ISO standard 1567) in 7 groups (n = 7), with 1 flat surface of each treated with 1 of the chemical etchants preceding adhesive application. The flexural strength (MPa) was measured using a 3-point bending test in a universal testing machine. The data were analyzed by 1-way analysis of variance and the Tukey HSD test (alpha = .05).
RESULTS: Significant differences were found between the groups in terms of microleakage (P < .0001). The lowest microleakage was observed in group M180 (30,000 x-ray counts) and the highest in the control group (44,000 x-ray counts). The mean bond strength to PMMA resin ranged from 1.44 to 2.22 MPa. All treated specimens showed significantly higher bond strength than controls (P < .01). The flexural strength values all significantly differed (P < .05). All experimental specimens that had chemical surface treatments showed lower flexural strength than controls (P < .05).
CONCLUSION: Treating the denture base resin surface with chemical etchants increased the bond strength of silicone-based resilient denture liner to denture base and decreased the microleakage between the 2 materials. Considering the results of both tests together, the use of methyl methacrylate monomer for 180 seconds was found to be the most effective chemical treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16473089     DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.11.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  13 in total

1.  Effect of Aging on Bond Strength of Two Soft Lining Materials to a Denture Base Polymer.

Authors:  Alaa'a M Salloum
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2014-09-10

Review 2.  Resilient liners: a review.

Authors:  Shobha Rodrigues; Vidya Shenoy; Thilak Shetty
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2012-07-06

3.  Effect of surface treatment on the flexural strength of denture base resin and tensile strength of autopolymerizing silicone based denture liner bonded to denture base resin: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Saloni Gupta
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2011-02-18

4.  Comparative evaluation of tensile bond strength of a polyvinyl acetate-based resilient liner following various denture base surface pre-treatment methods and immersion in artificial salivary medium: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Jacob M Philip; Dhanraj M Ganapathy; Padma Ariga
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2012-07

5.  The effect of denture base surface pretreatments on bond strengths of two long term resilient liners.

Authors:  Rahul Shyamrao Kulkarni; Rambhau Parkhedkar
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 1.904

6.  Microleakage Evaluation at Implant-Abutment Interface Using Radiotracer Technique.

Authors:  Hakimeh Siadat; Mahnaz Arshad; Hossein-Ali Mahgoli; Babak Fallahi
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2016-06

7.  Effect of denture cleansing agents on tensile and shear bond strengths of soft liners to acrylic denture base.

Authors:  Farhang Mahboub; Fariba Salehsaber; Fereydoon Parnia; Vahedeh Gharekhani; Yousef Kananizadeh; Mahsa Taghizadeh
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2017-09-20

8.  Microleakage of different post systems and a custom adapted fiber post.

Authors:  Farideh Geramipanah; Susan Mir Mohammad Rezaei; Saman Fallahi Sichani; Babak Fallahi Sichani; Leyla Sadighpour
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2013-01-31

9.  Peel strength of denture liner to PMMA and polyamide: laser versus air-abrasion.

Authors:  Fatih Mehmet Korkmaz; Bora Bagis; Mutlu Ozcan; Rukiye Durkan; Sedanur Turgut; Sabit Melih Ates
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 1.904

10.  In vitro evaluation of the fracture resistance and microleakage of porcelain laminate veneers bonded to teeth with composite fillings after cyclic loading.

Authors:  Leyla Sadighpour; Farideh Geramipanah; Somayeh Allahyari; Babak Fallahi Sichani; Mohamd Javad Kharazi Fard
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 1.904

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.