Literature DB >> 16472844

Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience.

Pedro T Ramirez1, Brian M Slomovitz, Pamela T Soliman, Robert L Coleman, Charles Levenback.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively evaluate the feasibility and morbidity of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent a total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy at our institution between May 2004 and August 2005. Data collected included age, body mass index, stage, histopathologic subtype, tumor grade, estimated blood loss, perioperative blood transfusions, number and status of lymph nodes obtained, status of surgical margins, length of hospital stay, time to resumption of normal bladder function, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and disease-free interval.
RESULTS: Twenty patients underwent total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy during the study period. None of the surgeries required conversion to laparotomy. The median patient age was 41.5 years (range, 25-76). Eighteen patients had cervix cancer (5 stage IA2 and 13 stage IB1), and 2 had endometrial cancer (1 stage IB and 1 stage IIIA). Among those with cervix cancer, 12 had adenocarcinoma, 4 squamous cell carcinoma, and 2 adenosquamous carcinoma. The median weight was 70 kg (range, 49-112). The median number of resected pelvic lymph nodes was 13 (range, 9-26). One patient had nodal disease. The surgical margins were free of disease in all cases. The median blood loss was 200 ml (range, 25-700 ml). Only 1 patient required an intraoperative blood transfusion (1 U packed red blood cells). The median length of hospital stay was 1 day (range, 1-5). There were 3 short-term complications--unintentional cystotomy, pulmonary embolus, and pneumomediastinum with subcutaneous emphysema. There were 2 long-term complications--vaginal eviscerations and a lymphocyst. The median time to resumption of normal bladder function was 16 days (range, 13-29). The median follow-up time was 8 months range (1-16). All patients remain free of disease at the time of this report.
CONCLUSIONS: Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy can be performed safely with minimal blood loss and postoperative morbidity, and patients undergoing this procedure may be discharged after an overnight stay in the hospital.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16472844     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.12.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  27 in total

1.  Risk factors for prolonged hospitalization after gynecologic laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Behrouz Zand; Michael Frumovitz; Matias F Jofre; Alpa M Nick; Ricardo Dos Reis; Mark F Munsell; Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar; Charles Levenback; Pamela T Soliman; Kathleen M Schmeler; Pedro T Ramirez
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-06-02       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Survival and prognosticators of node-positive cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy and systematic lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  Masayoshi Hosaka; Hidemichi Watari; Takashi Mitamura; Yousuke Konno; Tetsuji Odagiri; Tatsuya Kato; Mahito Takeda; Noriaki Sakuragi
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for treatment of uterine malignant tumors: analysis of short-term therapeutic efficacy.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Zehua Wang
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2010-06-17

4.  Urologic complications of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  Jong Ha Hwang; Myong Cheol Lim; Jae Young Joung; Sang-Soo Seo; Sokbom Kang; Ho Kyung Seo; Jinsoo Chung; Sang-Yoon Park
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Quality of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in developing countries: a comparison of surgical and oncologic outcomes between a comprehensive cancer center in the United States and a cancer center in Colombia.

Authors:  Rene Pareja; Alpa M Nick; Kathleen M Schmeler; Michael Frumovitz; Pamela T Soliman; Carlos A Buitrago; Mauricio Borrero; Gonzalo Angel; Ricardo Dos Reis; Pedro T Ramirez
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Comparison of a novel surgical approach for radical hysterectomy: robotic assistance versus open surgery.

Authors:  Gerald Feuer; Benedict Benigno; Lindal Krige; Patricia Alvarez
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2009-10-09

7.  Analgesic and antiemetic requirements after minimally invasive surgery for early cervical cancer: a comparison between laparoscopy and robotic surgery.

Authors:  Pamela T Soliman; Ginger Langley; Mark F Munsell; Hemang A Vaniya; Michael Frumovitz; Pedro T Ramirez
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 8.  Diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of borderline ovarian tumors.

Authors:  Daniela Fischerova; Michal Zikan; Pavel Dundr; David Cibula
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-09-28

Review 9.  Innovative laparoscopic surgery in gynecologic oncology.

Authors:  Siobhan M Kehoe; Pedro T Ramirez; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.075

10.  A comparison of robot-assisted and traditional radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer.

Authors:  M Patrick Lowe; Anna V Hoekstra; Arati Jairam-Thodla; Diljeet K Singh; Barbara M Buttin; John R Lurain; Julian C Schink
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2009-02-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.