Literature DB >> 16472566

Uterine perforation in women using a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system.

K Van Houdenhoven1, K J A F van Kaam, A C van Grootheest, T H B Salemans, G A J Dunselman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine an estimated incidence of uterine perforations related to the insertion of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG IUS) and to identify possible risk factors.
DESIGN: Retrospective, case report study.
SETTING: Hospitals in Limburg, the Netherlands.
METHODS: Gynecologists in hospitals in Limburg were asked about uterine perforations related to the insertion of a LNG IUS between 1999 and 2002. The charts of the reported perforations were studied. Data on the patient, doctor, insertion, diagnosis and removal were collected for every reported uterine perforation.
RESULTS: In Limburg, the estimated incidence of uterine perforations related to the insertion of a LNG IUS is 2.6 per 1000 insertions. Insertion in lactating women, even beyond 6 weeks after delivery, was shown to be an important risk factor.
CONCLUSIONS: Complete registration of complications provides a greater insight into the actual incidence of LNG IUS-related uterine perforations and their possible consequences. This may eventually lead to a decrease in complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16472566     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2005.08.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  14 in total

1.  Ultrasound Location of Misplaced Levonorgestrel Releasing Intrauterine System (LNG-IUS) - is it easy?

Authors:  Vaidyanathan Gowri; Mariam Mathew
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2009-01

2.  Translocation of Postplacental Intrauterine Device: A Rare Complication.

Authors:  Sujnanendra Mishra
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2016-04-27

3.  Uterine perforation with the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device: analysis of reports from four national pharmacovigilance centres.

Authors:  Kees van Grootheest; Bernhardt Sachs; Mira Harrison-Woolrych; Pia Caduff-Janosa; Eugène van Puijenbroek
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 4.  Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System (52 mg) for Idiopathic Heavy Menstrual Bleeding: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2016-11-01

Review 5.  Contraception for cancer survivors.

Authors:  Eleanor Bimla Schwarz; Rachel Hess; James Trussell
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  The wandering Mirena: laparoscopic retrieval.

Authors:  Mark Erian; Glenda McLaren; David Baartz
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2011 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  Role of uterine forces in intrauterine device embedment, perforation, and expulsion.

Authors:  Norman D Goldstuck; Dirk Wildemeersch
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2014-08-07

8.  Review of the safety, efficacy and patient acceptability of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system.

Authors:  Chandra Kailasam; David Cahill
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 2.711

9.  Restoration of fertility after removal of extrauterine mirena coil: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Smriti R C Bhatta; Radwan Faraj
Journal:  Case Rep Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-08-16

10.  Comparing options for females seeking permanent contraception in high resource countries: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rebecca Gormley; Brian Vickers; Brooke Cheng; Wendy V Norman
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 3.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.