Literature DB >> 16471456

Contact allergies to cosmetics: testing with 52 cosmetic ingredients and personal products.

Jyoti Tomar1, Vijay Kumar Jain, Kamal Aggarwal, Surbhi Dayal, Sanjeev Gupta.   

Abstract

Fifty patients of both sexes with clinically suspected cosmetic dermatitis were subjected to patch testing with a cosmetic and fragrance series, approved by the Contact and Occupational Dermatosis Forum of India (CODFI), and with selected allergens from the Indian Standard Series (ISS). Most of these patients were young adults between 10-29 years; the mean age was 27.5 years. The majority of the patients had cosmetic dermatitis of <1 year duration (68%). The occupational profiles of the patients included students (46%), housewives (18%), teachers (10%) and laborers (4%). A miscellaneous group, comprised of tailors, farmers, staff nurses, beauticians, jewellers and engineers, accounted for the remaining 22%. The most commonly involved site was the face, followed by the forehead, neck and scalp. Patch testing of these patients revealed that, out of the 50 subjects tested, thirty-three (66%) reacted to one or more allergens. Fragrance components were the most common offending allergen (51.5%) followed by preservatives (39.3%), paraphenylenediamine (PPD) (21.2%), and cetrimide and tertiary butyl hydroquinone (12.1% each), in descending order of frequency. Hence, patch testing, with the standard series supplemented by personal cosmetics; should be considered for patients with cosmetic dermatitis to determine the offending allergen so as to avoid further contact with that allergen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16471456     DOI: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2005.tb00880.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dermatol        ISSN: 0385-2407            Impact factor:   4.005


  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of suspected cosmetic induced facial dermatoses with the use of Indian standard series and cosmetic series patch test.

Authors:  Madhur Kant Rastogi; Astha Gupta; Puneet Singh Soodan; Nitin Mishra; Pratik Gahalaut
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-03-01

Review 2.  Skin Toxicity of Selected Hair Cosmetic Ingredients: A Review Focusing on Hairdressers.

Authors:  Cara Symanzik; Patricia Weinert; Željka Babić; Sarah Hallmann; Martin Stibius Havmose; Jeanne Duus Johansen; Sanja Kezic; Marija Macan; Jelena Macan; Julia Strahwald; Rajka Turk; Henk F van der Molen; Swen Malte John; Wolfgang Uter
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Cosmetic contact sensitivity in patients with melasma: results of a pilot study.

Authors:  Neel Prabha; Vikram K Mahajan; Karaninder S Mehta; Pushpinder S Chauhan; Mrinal Gupta
Journal:  Dermatol Res Pract       Date:  2014-07-14

4.  Cosmetic Use and Its Adverse Events among Female Employees of Jimma University, Southwest Ethiopia.

Authors:  Mestawet Getachew; Tsegaye Tewelde
Journal:  Ethiop J Health Sci       Date:  2018-11

5.  Contact Dermatitis Due to Local Cosmetics: A Study from Northern India.

Authors:  Sheena Goyal; Naheed Sajid; Sajid Husain
Journal:  Indian J Dermatol       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.494

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.