Literature DB >> 16471433

Despeckling of medical ultrasound images.

Oleg V Michailovich1, Allen Tannenbaum.   

Abstract

Speckle noise is an inherent property of medical ultrasound imaging, and it generally tends to reduce the image resolution and contrast, thereby reducing the diagnostic value of this imaging modality. As a result, speckle noise reduction is an important prerequisite, whenever ultrasound imaging is used for tissue characterization. Among the many methods that have been proposed to perform this task, there exists a class of approaches that use a multiplicative model of speckled image formation and take advantage of the logarithmical transformation in order to convert multiplicative speckle noise into additive noise. The common assumption made in a dominant number of such studies is that the samples of the additive noise are mutually uncorrelated and obey a Gaussian distribution. The present study shows conceptually and experimentally that this assumption is oversimplified and unnatural. Moreover, it may lead to inadequate performance of the speckle reduction methods. The study introduces a simple preprocessing procedure, which modifies the acquired radio-frequency images (without affecting the anatomical information they contain), so that the noise in the log-transformation domain becomes very close in its behavior to a white Gaussian noise. As a result, the preprocessing allows filtering methods based on assuming the noise to be white and Gaussian, to perform in nearly optimal conditions. The study evaluates performances of three different, nonlinear filters--wavelet denoising, total variation filtering, and anisotropic diffusion--and demonstrates that, in all these cases, the proposed preprocessing significantly improves the quality of resultant images. Our numerical tests include a series of computer-simulated and in vivo experiments.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16471433      PMCID: PMC3639001          DOI: 10.1109/tuffc.2006.1588392

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control        ISSN: 0885-3010            Impact factor:   2.725


  23 in total

1.  Wavelet-based speckle noise reduction in ultrasound B-scan images.

Authors:  A Rakotomamonjy; P Deforge; P Marché
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.578

2.  Robust estimation of ultrasound pulses using outlier-resistant de-noising.

Authors:  Oleg Michailovich; Dan Adam
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  When is speckle noise multiplicative?

Authors:  M Tur; K C Chin; J W Goodman
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1982-04-01       Impact factor: 1.980

4.  Power spectrum equalization for ultrasonic image restoration.

Authors:  D Iraca; L Landini; L Verrazzani
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  The digital TV filter and nonlinear denoising.

Authors:  T F Chan; S Osher; J Shen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 10.856

6.  Statistical characterization of diffuse scattering in ultrasound images.

Authors:  G Georgiou; F S Cohen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  Speckle reduction and contrast enhancement of echocardiograms via multiscale nonlinear processing.

Authors:  X Zong; A F Laine; E A Geiser
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Improvement of lesion detectability by speckle reduction filtering: a quantitative study.

Authors:  J T Verhoeven; J M Thijssen
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 1.578

9.  Deviations from Rayleigh statistics in ultrasonic speckle.

Authors:  T A Tuthill; R H Sperry; K J Parker
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 1.578

10.  Quantitative relationship between tissue composition and scattering of ultrasound.

Authors:  C M Sehgal
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  22 in total

1.  An effective approach of lesion segmentation within the breast ultrasound image based on the cellular automata principle.

Authors:  Yan Liu; H D Cheng; Jianhua Huang; Yingtao Zhang; Xianglong Tang
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Automated skin segmentation in ultrasonic evaluation of skin toxicity in breast cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Yi Gao; Allen Tannenbaum; Hao Chen; Mylin Torres; Emi Yoshida; Xiaofeng Yang; Yuefeng Wang; Walter Curran; Tian Liu
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Fetal ultrasound image segmentation system and its use in fetal weight estimation.

Authors:  Jinhua Yu; Yuanyuan Wang; Ping Chen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-10-11       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Dynamic denoising of tracking sequences.

Authors:  Oleg Michailovich; Allen Tannenbaum
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 10.856

5.  Classification of breast masses in ultrasound images using self-adaptive differential evolution extreme learning machine and rough set feature selection.

Authors:  Kadayanallur Mahadevan Prabusankarlal; Palanisamy Thirumoorthy; Radhakrishnan Manavalan
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-06-16

6.  Entropy-based straight kernel filter for echocardiography image denoising.

Authors:  S Rajalaxmi; S Nirmala
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Ultrasound despeckling for contrast enhancement.

Authors:  Peter C Tay; Christopher D Garson; Scott T Acton; John A Hossack
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 10.856

8.  Line Detection as an Inverse Problem: Application to Lung Ultrasound Imaging.

Authors:  Nantheera Anantrasirichai; Wesley Hayes; Marco Allinovi; David Bull; Alin Achim
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  Left Ventricle Segmentation Using Model Fitting and Active Surfaces.

Authors:  Peter C Tay; Bing Li; Chris D Garson; Scott T Acton; John A Hossack
Journal:  J Signal Process Syst       Date:  2009-04-01

10.  Intrinsic Tradeoffs in Multi-Covariate Imaging of Sub-Resolution Targets.

Authors:  Matthew R Morgan; Gregg E Trahey; William F Walker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 2.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.