BACKGROUND: Oral cancer typically affects smokers older than 50 years of age. Recently, however, a marked increase in the number of patients 40 years old and younger, many with no history of tobacco smoking, has been noted. Studies in this age group have so far been restricted to genomic areas well recognized as abnormal in typical patients with oral cancer. The aim of this study was to assess genomic aberrations in oral cancer, using comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) microarray technology, and to compare the genomic aberration profile of patients older than 40 years old with those 40 years old and younger. METHODS: Tumor samples from 20 patients with oral cancer (age range, 21-78; 10 smokers and 10 nonsmokers) were laser microdissected, and array CGH was used to identify genomic imbalances in these two cohorts. RESULTS: The older cohort showed high numbers of gains and losses in contrast to very few copy number changes in the younger nonsmoker cohort. In concurrence with the literature, tumors from the older cohort manifested deletions involving 3p and 9p21 and gains involving 3q, 5q, 7p, 8q, 11q, and 20q. The younger group, particularly the nonsmokers, showed very few changes overall, and the aberrations were not in the sites classically associated with oral cancer. Deletion of CDKN2A (p16) was completely absent in the younger group but was present in 50% of the older cohort. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated that there is far less genomic instability in young nonsmokers with oral cancer than found in typical patients with oral cancer. These observations indicate that oral cancer presenting at a younger age, particularly in nonsmokers, has a genomic profile different from the classically described oral cancer. Copyright 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
BACKGROUND:Oral cancer typically affects smokers older than 50 years of age. Recently, however, a marked increase in the number of patients 40 years old and younger, many with no history of tobacco smoking, has been noted. Studies in this age group have so far been restricted to genomic areas well recognized as abnormal in typical patients with oral cancer. The aim of this study was to assess genomic aberrations in oral cancer, using comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) microarray technology, and to compare the genomic aberration profile of patients older than 40 years old with those 40 years old and younger. METHODS: Tumor samples from 20 patients with oral cancer (age range, 21-78; 10 smokers and 10 nonsmokers) were laser microdissected, and array CGH was used to identify genomic imbalances in these two cohorts. RESULTS: The older cohort showed high numbers of gains and losses in contrast to very few copy number changes in the younger nonsmoker cohort. In concurrence with the literature, tumors from the older cohort manifested deletions involving 3p and 9p21 and gains involving 3q, 5q, 7p, 8q, 11q, and 20q. The younger group, particularly the nonsmokers, showed very few changes overall, and the aberrations were not in the sites classically associated with oral cancer. Deletion of CDKN2A (p16) was completely absent in the younger group but was present in 50% of the older cohort. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated that there is far less genomic instability in young nonsmokers with oral cancer than found in typical patients with oral cancer. These observations indicate that oral cancer presenting at a younger age, particularly in nonsmokers, has a genomic profile different from the classically described oral cancer. Copyright 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Authors: Adam M Sonabend; Mukesh Bansal; Paolo Guarnieri; Liang Lei; Benjamin Amendolara; Craig Soderquist; Richard Leung; Jonathan Yun; Benjamin Kennedy; Julia Sisti; Samuel Bruce; Rachel Bruce; Reena Shakya; Thomas Ludwig; Steven Rosenfeld; Peter A Sims; Jeffrey N Bruce; Andrea Califano; Peter Canoll Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2014-01-03 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Tatyana Isayeva; Jie Xu; Camille Ragin; Qian Dai; Tiffiny Cooper; William Carroll; Dan Dayan; Marilena Vered; Bruce Wenig; Eben Rosenthal; William Grizzle; Joshua Anderson; Christopher D Willey; Eddy S Yang; Margaret Brandwein-Gensler Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2014-12-19 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Martine Froukje van der Kamp; Gyorgy Bela Halmos; Victor Guryev; Peter Laszlo Horvatovich; Ed Schuuring; Bernardus Franciscus Augustinus Maria van der Laan; Bert van der Vegt; Boudewijn Evert Christiaan Plaat; Cornelia Johanna Verhoeven Journal: Cell Oncol (Dordr) Date: 2022-01-11 Impact factor: 6.730
Authors: Robbie Woods; Esther M O'Regan; Susan Kennedy; Cara Martin; John J O'Leary; Conrad Timon Journal: World J Clin Cases Date: 2014-06-16 Impact factor: 1.337
Authors: F Farshadpour; S Konings; E J M Speel; G J Hordijk; R Koole; M van Blokland; P J Slootweg; J A Kummer Journal: Patholog Res Int Date: 2011-07-12