Literature DB >> 16470431

Measurement of bone mineral density is possible with standard radiographs: a study involving total knee replacement.

Daniel Hernandez-Vaquero1, Manuel Angel Garcia-Sandoval, Jose Manuel Fernandez-Carreira, Abelardo Suarez-Vázquez, Domingo Perez-Hernández.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Measured bone density correlates well with the mechanical properties of the bone. Our objective was to evaluate optical densitometry as a method of measuring the periprosthetic bone density of the tibial platform in total knee replacement using serial dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as the reference test.
METHODS: 30 patients who underwent a cemented total knee replacement were followed up for over 2 years. Standard radiographs of the knee were obtained at 12 and 24 months. These were photographed with a digital camera and enhanced with image processing software. A DXA scan was performed at the same time as the reference method. 3 regions of interest were defined under the tibial plateau (medial, lateral and stem positions).
RESULTS: After 24 months of follow-up there was a significant decrease in density in the 3 regions, both with the optical and DXA methods. The concordance between methods was studied using Bland and Altman plots, Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficients resulted in values from 0.72 to 0.87, depending on the region and the follow-up time.
INTERPRETATION: Quantification of optical density values with a standardized measurement system on conventional radiographs is a reliable and efficient method of determining the bone mineral density.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16470431     DOI: 10.1080/17453670510045381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop        ISSN: 1745-3674            Impact factor:   3.717


  8 in total

1.  Influence of the tibial stem design on bone density after cemented total knee arthroplasty: a prospective seven-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Daniel Hernandez-Vaquero; Manuel A Garcia-Sandoval; Jose M Fernandez-Carreira; Richard Gava
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-11-18       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Densitometric evaluation of bone-prosthetic counterface in hip and knee arthroplasty with modern implants.

Authors:  Andrea Cozzi Lepri; Marco Giorgini; Carla Signorini; Christian Carulli; Roberto Civinini; Maria Luisa Brandi; Massimo Innocenti
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2016-10-05

3.  How to reduce osteopenia in total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Claude Schwartz
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-08-16

4.  Impaction Bone Grafting Combined with Titanium Mesh for Acetabular Bone Defects Reconstruction in Total Hip Arthroplasty Revision: A Retrospective and Mini-Review Study.

Authors:  Xiang Li; Bai-Qi Pan; Xiao-Yu Wu; Ming Fu; Wei-Ming Liao; Chu-Heng Wu; Pu-Yi Sheng
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 5.  Periprosthetic bone loss: diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.

Authors:  Loredana Cavalli; Maria Luisa Brandi
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2014-06-17

6.  A study on OPG/RANK/RANKL axis in osteoporotic bile duct-ligated rats and the involvement of nitrergic and opioidergic systems.

Authors:  Amir Hossein Doustimotlagh; Ahmad Reza Dehpour; Shahroo Etemad-Moghadam; Mojgan Alaeddini; Sattar Ostadhadi; Abolfazl Golestani
Journal:  Res Pharm Sci       Date:  2018-06

7.  Medium Activity Prevents Periprosthetic Bone Mass Loss in the Medial Metaphyseal Region of the Tibia after Posterior-Stabilized TKA: A 5-Year Follow-up Study of 110 Knees.

Authors:  Yong Liu; Peiheng He; Xing Li; Minghao Liu; Weizhi Chen; Dongliang Xu
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 8.  Periprosthetic fractures after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a narrative review.

Authors:  L Thoreau; D Morcillo Marfil; E Thienpont
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 2.928

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.