Literature DB >> 16470399

Square-lashing technique in segmental spinal instrumentation: a biomechanical study.

Vincent Arlet1, Kevin Draxinger, Lorne Beckman, Thomas Steffen.   

Abstract

Sublaminar wires have been used for many years for segmental spinal instrumentation in scoliosis surgery. More recently, stainless steel wires have been replaced by titanium cables. However, in rigid scoliotic curves, sublaminar wires or simple cables can either brake or pull out. The square-lashing technique was devised to avoid complications such as cable breakage or lamina cutout. The purpose of the study was therefore to test biomechanically the pull out and failure mode of simple sublaminar constructs versus the square-lashing technique. Individual vertebrae were subjected to pullout testing having one of two different constructs (single loop and square lashing) using either monofilament wire or multifilament cables. Four different methods of fixation were therefore tested: single wire construct, square-lashing wiring construct, single cable construct, and square-lashing cable construct. Ultimate failure load and failure mechanism were recorded. For the single wire the construct failed 12/16 times by wire breakage with an average ultimate failure load of 793 N. For the square-lashing wire the construct failed with pedicle fracture in 14/16, one bilateral lamina fracture, and one wire breakage. Ultimate failure load average was 1,239 N For the single cable the construct failed 12/16 times due to cable breakage (average force 1,162 N). 10/12 of these breakages were where the cable looped over the rod. For the square-lashing cable all of these constructs (16/16) failed by fracture of the pedicle with an average ultimate failure load of 1,388 N. The square-lashing construct had a higher pullout strength than the single loop and almost no cutting out from the lamina. The square-lashing technique with cables may therefore represent a new advance in segmental spinal instrumentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16470399      PMCID: PMC3233937          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-005-0010-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  7 in total

1.  The use of sublaminar cables to replace Luque wires.

Authors:  M N Songer; D L Spencer; P R Meyer; G Jayaraman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  The biomechanical analysis of sublaminar wires and cables using luque segmental spinal instrumentation.

Authors:  J R Parsons; B V Chokshi; C K Lee; R V Gundlapalli; D Stamer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Segmental spinal instrumentation for correction of scoliosis.

Authors:  E R Luque
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Comparative mechanical properties of spinal cable and wire fixation systems.

Authors:  C A Dickman; S M Papadopoulos; N R Crawford; A G Brantley; R L Gealer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Safety of sublaminar wires with Isola instrumentation for the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  F P Girardi; O Boachie-Adjei; B A Rawlins
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Segmental spinal instrumentation for neuromuscular spinal deformity.

Authors:  D B Stevens; C Beard
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  In vitro biomechanical comparison of pedicle screws, sublaminar hooks, and sublaminar cables.

Authors:  Patrick W Hitchon; Matthew D Brenton; Andrew G Black; Aaron From; Jeremy S Harrod; Christopher Barry; Hassan Serhan; James C Torner
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.115

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.