Literature DB >> 16469352

Metacontrast masking suggests interaction between visual pathways with different spatial and temporal properties.

Ayako Ishikawa1, Satoshi Shimegi, Hiromichi Sato.   

Abstract

We examined the spatiotemporal characteristics of metacontrast using sinusoidal grating stimuli as the target and mask for quantitative comparison with the functional properties of the visual cortex. The magnitude of metacontrast effects depended on the stimulus features such as the orientation and spatial frequency of the target and mask. The characteristics of metacontrast dynamically changed depending on the stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA). At short SOAs (0 to approximately 40 ms), metacontrast exhibited a high stimulus feature specificity and a low contrast sensitivity, whereas at long SOAs ( approximately 40 to 80 ms), metacontrast exhibited a low stimulus feature specificity and a high contrast sensitivity. We suggest that metacontrast is explained by the interaction between two parallel visual pathways: one with a low contrast sensitivity and a high feature specificity, and the other with a high contrast sensitivity and a low feature specificity.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16469352     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.12.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  9 in total

Review 1.  Lateral effects in pattern vision.

Authors:  John M Foley
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Binding binding: Departure points for a different version of the perceptual retouch theory.

Authors:  Talis Bachmann
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-07-15

3.  The time course of contrast masking reveals two distinct mechanisms of human surround suppression.

Authors:  Yury Petrov; Suzanne P McKee
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Long-range suppressive interactions between S-cone and luminance channels.

Authors:  Alex R Wade
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Early dissociation between neural signatures of endogenous spatial attention and perceptual awareness during visual masking.

Authors:  Valentin Wyart; Stanislas Dehaene; Catherine Tallon-Baudry
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Identifying separate components of surround suppression.

Authors:  Michael-Paul Schallmo; Scott O Murray
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Distinct spatiotemporal mechanisms underlie extra-classical receptive field modulation in macaque V1 microcircuits.

Authors:  Christopher A Henry; Mehrdad Jazayeri; Robert M Shapley; Michael J Hawken
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Internal noise measures in coarse and fine motion direction discrimination tasks and the correlation with autism traits.

Authors:  Edwina R Orchard; Steven C Dakin; Jeroen J A van Boxtel
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 2.004

9.  The effects of orientation and attention during surround suppression of small image features: A 7 Tesla fMRI study.

Authors:  Michael-Paul Schallmo; Andrea N Grant; Philip C Burton; Cheryl A Olman
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.