Literature DB >> 16468509

Device-related reoperations after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.

Sergey Lyass1, Scott A Cunneen, Masanobu Hagiike, Monali Misra, Miguel Burch, Theodore M Khalili, Gary Furman, Edward H Phillips.   

Abstract

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) is considered a relatively safe weight loss procedure with low morbidity. When complications occur, obstruction, erosion, and port malfunction require reoperation. We retrospectively reviewed our experience with 270 consecutive patients who underwent LAGB. Device-related reoperations were performed in 26 (10%) patients. Reoperations were related to the band in 13, to port/tubing in 11, and related to both in 2 patients. Of the 15 band-related problems, it was removed in 5 (2%): slippage (3), intra-abdominal abscess (1), and during emergent operation for bleeding duodenal ulcer (1). Revision or immediate replacement was performed in 10 (4%): slippage (5), obstruction (4), and leak from the reservoir (1). Port/tubing problems were the reason for reoperations in 13 (5%): infection (5), crack at tubing-port connection (6), and port rotation (2). Port removal for infection was followed later by port replacement (average 9 months). Overall, slippage occurred in 8 (3%), obstruction in 4 (1.5%), leak from reservoir in 7 (3%), and infection in 5 (2%) patients. Fifteen device-related problems occurred during our first 100 cases and 12 subsequently (P = 0.057). Permanent LapBand loss was only 5 per cent, leading to overall rate of 95 per cent of LapBand preservation as a restrictive device.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16468509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  7 in total

1.  Impact of lap-band size on weight loss: does gender matter?

Authors:  Ali Ardestani; Ardalan Tangestanipoor; Malcolm K Robinson; David B Lautz; Ashley H Vernon; Ali Tavakkoli
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 2.  Systematic review of erosion after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.

Authors:  Kristine Egberts; Wendy A Brown; Paul E O'Brien
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  High secondary failure rate of rebanding after failed gastric banding.

Authors:  M K Müller; N Attigah; S Wildi; D Hahnloser; R Hauser; P-A Clavien; M Weber
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Leukocyte scintigraphy SPECT/CT software fusion diagnosis of infected gastric band.

Authors:  Ekaterina Tiktinsky; Sophie Lantsberg; Svetlana Agranovich; Boris Kirshtein; Leonid Lantsberg
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Anatomical measurements of the gastric cardia in obese patients.

Authors:  A Katherine Hindle; Florencia Gonzalez; Fred Brody
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Subfascial port placement in gastric banding surgery.

Authors:  Anthony Clough; Laurent Layani; Mayenaaz Sidhu; Lucas Wheatley; Abha Shah
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Visualization of the left extraperitoneal space and spatial relationships to its related spaces by the visible human project.

Authors:  Haotong Xu; Xiaoxiao Li; Zhengzhi Zhang; Mingguo Qiu; Qiwen Mu; Yi Wu; Liwen Tan; Shaoxiang Zhang; Xiaoming Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.